Demographics details for Bridgeport, CT vs Woodstock, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bridgeport, CT vs Woodstock, VA.
| Data | Bridgeport | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 148,377 | 5,907 |
| Median Age | 37.5 years | 38.4 years |
| Median Income | $54,440 | $64,470 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Bridgeport vs Woodstock
- In Bridgeport, the population is higher at 148,377, compared to 5,907 in Woodstock.
- The median age in Woodstock is higher at 38.4 years, compared to 37.5 years in Bridgeport.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $64,470, compared to $54,440 in Bridgeport.
- In Woodstock, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 29.0% in Bridgeport.
- Bridgeport has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Woodstock.
- The unemployment rate in Bridgeport is higher at 4.4%, compared to 2.5% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics Bridgeport vs Woodstock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bridgeport | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | 6 |
| White | 26 | 60 |
| Asian | 7 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 36 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Woodstock
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bridgeport at 22% compared to 6% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Woodstock at 60% compared to 26% in Bridgeport.
- The Asian population is larger in Bridgeport at 7% compared to 4% in Woodstock.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bridgeport at 36% compared to 19% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodstock at 11%, compared to 9% in Bridgeport.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bridgeport and Woodstock at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bridgeport | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 18.2% | 24.9% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 18.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 32.7% | 38.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Woodstock
- In Woodstock, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 17.0% in Bridgeport.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Woodstock at 24.9% versus 18.2% in Bridgeport.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Bridgeport and Woodstock at 18.2%.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Woodstock at 16.2% compared to 13.7% in Bridgeport.
- Woodstock has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 32.7% in Bridgeport.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woodstock at 21.0% compared to 15.0% in Bridgeport.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bridgeport | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (3,659) | 2.0% (118) |
| High School Diploma | 18.7% (27,806) | 19.0% (1,121) |
| Less than High School | 23.9% (35,520) | 17.2% (1,018) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.8% (24,999) | 16.4% (968) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bridgeport vs Woodstock
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 2.0% in Woodstock.
- In Woodstock, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.0% compared to 18.7% in Bridgeport.
- More residents in Bridgeport have less than a high school education at 23.9% compared to 17.2% in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.8% compared to 16.4% in Woodstock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.