Demographics details for Bridgeport, CT vs Sand lake, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bridgeport, CT vs Sand lake, MI.
| Data | Bridgeport | Sand lake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 148,377 | 1,178 |
| Median Age | 37.5 years | 59.6 years |
| Median Income | $54,440 | $46,250 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Bridgeport vs Sand lake
- In Bridgeport, the population is higher at 148,377, compared to 1,178 in Sand lake.
- The median age in Sand lake is higher at 59.6 years, compared to 37.5 years in Bridgeport.
- Bridgeport has a higher median income of $54,440 compared to $46,250 in Sand lake.
- In Sand lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 29.0% in Bridgeport.
- Bridgeport has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Sand lake.
- The unemployment rate in Bridgeport is higher at 4.4%, compared to 4.1% in Sand lake.
Demographics
Demographics Bridgeport vs Sand lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bridgeport | Sand lake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | Data is updating |
| White | 26 | 96 |
| Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 36 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Sand lake
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bridgeport at 22% compared to 0% in Sand lake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sand lake at 96% compared to 26% in Bridgeport.
- The Asian population is larger in Bridgeport at 7% compared to 0% in Sand lake.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bridgeport at 36% compared to 2% in Sand lake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bridgeport at 9% compared to 2% in Sand lake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bridgeport and Sand lake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bridgeport | Sand lake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 20.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 18.2% | 28.1% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 24.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 32.7% | 40.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 28.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Sand lake
- In Sand lake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.1% compared to 17.0% in Bridgeport.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sand lake at 28.1% versus 18.2% in Bridgeport.
- Sand lake has a higher smoking rate at 24.0% compared to 18.2% in Bridgeport.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sand lake at 17.8% compared to 13.7% in Bridgeport.
- Sand lake has higher obesity rates at 40.1% compared to 32.7% in Bridgeport.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sand lake at 28.0% compared to 15.0% in Bridgeport.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bridgeport | Sand lake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (3,659) | 0.6% (7) |
| High School Diploma | 18.7% (27,806) | 27.5% (324) |
| Less than High School | 23.9% (35,520) | 22.1% (260) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.8% (24,999) | 12.4% (146) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bridgeport vs Sand lake
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.6% in Sand lake.
- In Sand lake, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.5% compared to 18.7% in Bridgeport.
- More residents in Bridgeport have less than a high school education at 23.9% compared to 22.1% in Sand lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.8% compared to 12.4% in Sand lake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.