Demographics details for Bridgeport, CT vs Port huron, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bridgeport, CT vs Port huron, MI.
Data | Bridgeport | Port huron |
---|---|---|
Population | 148,377 | 28,626 |
Median Age | 37.5 years | 39.0 years |
Median Income | $54,440 | $47,906 |
Married Families | 29.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 7.0 |
Population Comparison: Bridgeport vs Port huron
- In Bridgeport, the population is higher at 148,377, compared to 28,626 in Port huron.
- The median age in Port huron is higher at 39.0 years, compared to 37.5 years in Bridgeport.
- Bridgeport has a higher median income of $54,440 compared to $47,906 in Port huron.
- In Port huron, the percentage of married families is higher at 30.0%, compared to 29.0% in Bridgeport.
- The poverty level is higher in Port huron at 15%, compared to 12% in Bridgeport.
- Port huron has a higher unemployment rate at 7.0% compared to 4.4% in Bridgeport.
Demographics
Demographics Bridgeport vs Port huron provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bridgeport | Port huron |
---|---|---|
Black | 22 | 8 |
White | 26 | 76 |
Asian | 7 | 1 |
Hispanic | 36 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Port huron
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bridgeport at 22% compared to 8% in Port huron.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Port huron at 76% compared to 26% in Bridgeport.
- The Asian population is larger in Bridgeport at 7% compared to 1% in Port huron.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bridgeport at 36% compared to 7% in Port huron.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bridgeport at 9% compared to 8% in Port huron.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bridgeport and Port huron at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bridgeport | Port huron |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 20.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 15.0% |
Depression | 18.2% | 28.2% |
Smoking | 18.2% | 25.7% |
Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 16.7% |
Obesity | 32.7% | 40.5% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Port huron
- In Port huron, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 17.0% in Bridgeport.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Port huron at 28.2% versus 18.2% in Bridgeport.
- Port huron has a higher smoking rate at 25.7% compared to 18.2% in Bridgeport.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Port huron at 16.7% compared to 13.7% in Bridgeport.
- Port huron has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 32.7% in Bridgeport.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Port huron at 22.0% compared to 15.0% in Bridgeport.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bridgeport | Port huron |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.5% (3,659) | 0.6% (172) |
High School Diploma | 18.7% (27,806) | 19.5% (5,596) |
Less than High School | 23.9% (35,520) | 13.5% (3,870) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.8% (24,999) | 12.8% (3,662) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bridgeport vs Port huron
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.6% in Port huron.
- In Port huron, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.5% compared to 18.7% in Bridgeport.
- More residents in Bridgeport have less than a high school education at 23.9% compared to 13.5% in Port huron.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.8% compared to 12.8% in Port huron.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.