Demographics details for Bridgeport, CT vs Pleasant grove, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Bridgeport, CT vs Pleasant grove, UT.

Data Bridgeport Pleasant grove
Population 148,377 37,630
Median Age 37.5 years 27.6 years
Median Income $54,440 $91,322
Married Families 29.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 12% 7%
Unemployment Rate 4.4 3.6

Population Comparison: Bridgeport vs Pleasant grove

  • In Bridgeport, the population is higher at 148,377, compared to 37,630 in Pleasant grove.
  • Residents in Bridgeport have a higher median age of 37.5 years compared to 27.6 years in Pleasant grove.
  • Pleasant grove has a higher median income of $91,322, compared to $54,440 in Bridgeport.
  • In Pleasant grove, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 29.0% in Bridgeport.
  • Bridgeport has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 7% in Pleasant grove.
  • The unemployment rate in Bridgeport is higher at 4.4%, compared to 3.6% in Pleasant grove.

Demographics

Demographics Bridgeport vs Pleasant grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Bridgeport Pleasant grove
Black 22 Data is updating
White 26 81
Asian 7 2
Hispanic 36 10
Two or More Races 9 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Pleasant grove

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bridgeport at 22% compared to 0% in Pleasant grove.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Pleasant grove at 81% compared to 26% in Bridgeport.
  • The Asian population is larger in Bridgeport at 7% compared to 2% in Pleasant grove.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Bridgeport at 36% compared to 10% in Pleasant grove.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Bridgeport at 9% compared to 7% in Pleasant grove.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bridgeport and Pleasant grove at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Bridgeport Pleasant grove
Mental Health Not Good 17.0% 14.8%
Physical Health Not Good 13.3% 10.3%
Depression 18.2% 23.9%
Smoking 18.2% 7.2%
Binge Drinking 13.7% 8.3%
Obesity 32.7% 30.6%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Pleasant grove

  • More residents in Bridgeport report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 14.8% in Pleasant grove.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Pleasant grove at 23.9% versus 18.2% in Bridgeport.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 18.2% compared to 7.2% in Pleasant grove.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Bridgeport at 13.7% compared to 8.3% in Pleasant grove.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Bridgeport at 32.7% compared to 30.6% in Pleasant grove.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Bridgeport at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Pleasant grove.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Bridgeport Pleasant grove
No Schooling 2.5% (3,659) 0.6% (207)
High School Diploma 18.7% (27,806) 8.2% (3,089)
Less than High School 23.9% (35,520) 4.9% (1,844)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.8% (24,999) 22.1% (8,335)

Education Levels Comparison: Bridgeport vs Pleasant grove

  • A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.6% in Pleasant grove.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a high school diploma at 18.7% compared to 8.2% in Pleasant grove.
  • More residents in Bridgeport have less than a high school education at 23.9% compared to 4.9% in Pleasant grove.
  • In Pleasant grove, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.1% compared to 16.8% in Bridgeport.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.