Demographics details for Bridgeport, CT vs Pittsburg, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bridgeport, CT vs Pittsburg, CA.
| Data | Bridgeport | Pittsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 148,377 | 77,572 |
| Median Age | 37.5 years | 35.2 years |
| Median Income | $54,440 | $98,408 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Bridgeport vs Pittsburg
- In Bridgeport, the population is higher at 148,377, compared to 77,572 in Pittsburg.
- Residents in Bridgeport have a higher median age of 37.5 years compared to 35.2 years in Pittsburg.
- Pittsburg has a higher median income of $98,408, compared to $54,440 in Bridgeport.
- In Pittsburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 29.0% in Bridgeport.
- Bridgeport has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Pittsburg.
- Pittsburg has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 4.4% in Bridgeport.
Demographics
Demographics Bridgeport vs Pittsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bridgeport | Pittsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | 15 |
| White | 26 | 9 |
| Asian | 7 | 18 |
| Hispanic | 36 | 43 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Pittsburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bridgeport at 22% compared to 15% in Pittsburg.
- Bridgeport has a higher percentage of White residents at 26% compared to 9% in Pittsburg.
- In Pittsburg, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 7% in Bridgeport.
- Pittsburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 43%, compared to 36% in Bridgeport.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pittsburg at 14%, compared to 9% in Bridgeport.
- In Pittsburg, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Bridgeport.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bridgeport | Pittsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 11.8% |
| Depression | 18.2% | 16.7% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 12.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 32.7% | 28.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Pittsburg
- More residents in Bridgeport report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 15.8% in Pittsburg.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 18.2% compared to 16.7% in Pittsburg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 18.2% compared to 12.7% in Pittsburg.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pittsburg at 15.0% compared to 13.7% in Bridgeport.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bridgeport at 32.7% compared to 28.4% in Pittsburg.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bridgeport at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in Pittsburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bridgeport | Pittsburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (3,659) | 3.1% (2,439) |
| High School Diploma | 18.7% (27,806) | 14.5% (11,263) |
| Less than High School | 23.9% (35,520) | 23.3% (18,048) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.8% (24,999) | 14.8% (11,476) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bridgeport vs Pittsburg
- In Pittsburg, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 2.5% in Bridgeport.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a high school diploma at 18.7% compared to 14.5% in Pittsburg.
- More residents in Bridgeport have less than a high school education at 23.9% compared to 23.3% in Pittsburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.8% compared to 14.8% in Pittsburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.