Demographics details for Bridgeport, CT vs New prague, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bridgeport, CT vs New prague, MN.
Data | Bridgeport | New prague |
---|---|---|
Population | 148,377 | 8,277 |
Median Age | 37.5 years | 35.3 years |
Median Income | $54,440 | $101,579 |
Married Families | 29.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Bridgeport vs New prague
- In Bridgeport, the population is higher at 148,377, compared to 8,277 in New prague.
- Residents in Bridgeport have a higher median age of 37.5 years compared to 35.3 years in New prague.
- New prague has a higher median income of $101,579, compared to $54,440 in Bridgeport.
- In New prague, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 29.0% in Bridgeport.
- Bridgeport has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in New prague.
- The unemployment rate in Bridgeport is higher at 4.4%, compared to 3.2% in New prague.
Demographics
Demographics Bridgeport vs New prague provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bridgeport | New prague |
---|---|---|
Black | 22 | Data is updating |
White | 26 | 91 |
Asian | 7 | 3 |
Hispanic | 36 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bridgeport vs New prague
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bridgeport at 22% compared to 0% in New prague.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in New prague at 91% compared to 26% in Bridgeport.
- The Asian population is larger in Bridgeport at 7% compared to 3% in New prague.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bridgeport at 36% compared to 2% in New prague.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bridgeport at 9% compared to 4% in New prague.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bridgeport and New prague at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bridgeport | New prague |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 13.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 8.3% |
Depression | 18.2% | 22.3% |
Smoking | 18.2% | 14.7% |
Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 20.8% |
Obesity | 32.7% | 34.5% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bridgeport vs New prague
- More residents in Bridgeport report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 13.7% in New prague.
- Higher depression rates are seen in New prague at 22.3% versus 18.2% in Bridgeport.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 18.2% compared to 14.7% in New prague.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in New prague at 20.8% compared to 13.7% in Bridgeport.
- New prague has higher obesity rates at 34.5% compared to 32.7% in Bridgeport.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bridgeport at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in New prague.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bridgeport | New prague |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.5% (3,659) | 0.3% (26) |
High School Diploma | 18.7% (27,806) | 14.5% (1,198) |
Less than High School | 23.9% (35,520) | 5.2% (427) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.8% (24,999) | 18.2% (1,509) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bridgeport vs New prague
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.3% in New prague.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a high school diploma at 18.7% compared to 14.5% in New prague.
- More residents in Bridgeport have less than a high school education at 23.9% compared to 5.2% in New prague.
- In New prague, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.2% compared to 16.8% in Bridgeport.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.