Demographics details for Bridgeport, CT vs Lancaster, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bridgeport, CT vs Lancaster, SC.
| Data | Bridgeport | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 148,377 | 104,577 |
| Median Age | 37.5 years | 42.2 years |
| Median Income | $54,440 | $72,186 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Bridgeport vs Lancaster
- In Bridgeport, the population is higher at 148,377, compared to 104,577 in Lancaster.
- The median age in Lancaster is higher at 42.2 years, compared to 37.5 years in Bridgeport.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $72,186, compared to $54,440 in Bridgeport.
- In Lancaster, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 29.0% in Bridgeport.
- Bridgeport has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 4.4% in Bridgeport.
Demographics
Demographics Bridgeport vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bridgeport | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | 18 |
| White | 26 | 70 |
| Asian | 7 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 36 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Lancaster
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bridgeport at 22% compared to 18% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lancaster at 70% compared to 26% in Bridgeport.
- The Asian population is larger in Bridgeport at 7% compared to 2% in Lancaster.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bridgeport at 36% compared to 6% in Lancaster.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bridgeport at 9% compared to 4% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bridgeport and Lancaster at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bridgeport | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 18.2% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 16.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 32.7% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Lancaster
- More residents in Bridgeport report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 16.6% in Lancaster.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lancaster at 22.0% versus 18.2% in Bridgeport.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 18.2% compared to 16.9% in Lancaster.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lancaster at 17.3% compared to 13.7% in Bridgeport.
- Lancaster has higher obesity rates at 32.9% compared to 32.7% in Bridgeport.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bridgeport at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Lancaster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bridgeport | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (3,659) | 0.7% (689) |
| High School Diploma | 18.7% (27,806) | 16.0% (16,691) |
| Less than High School | 23.9% (35,520) | 12.5% (13,112) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.8% (24,999) | 20.2% (21,156) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bridgeport vs Lancaster
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.7% in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a high school diploma at 18.7% compared to 16.0% in Lancaster.
- More residents in Bridgeport have less than a high school education at 23.9% compared to 12.5% in Lancaster.
- In Lancaster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 16.8% in Bridgeport.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.