Demographics details for Bridgeport, CT vs Iuka, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bridgeport, CT vs Iuka, MS.
| Data | Bridgeport | Iuka |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 148,377 | 3,096 |
| Median Age | 37.5 years | 37.2 years |
| Median Income | $54,440 | $43,887 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 22% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Bridgeport vs Iuka
- In Bridgeport, the population is higher at 148,377, compared to 3,096 in Iuka.
- Residents in Bridgeport have a higher median age of 37.5 years compared to 37.2 years in Iuka.
- Bridgeport has a higher median income of $54,440 compared to $43,887 in Iuka.
- In Iuka, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 29.0% in Bridgeport.
- The poverty level is higher in Iuka at 22%, compared to 12% in Bridgeport.
- Iuka has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.4% in Bridgeport.
Demographics
Demographics Bridgeport vs Iuka provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bridgeport | Iuka |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | 4 |
| White | 26 | 94 |
| Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 36 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Iuka
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bridgeport at 22% compared to 4% in Iuka.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Iuka at 94% compared to 26% in Bridgeport.
- The Asian population is larger in Bridgeport at 7% compared to 0% in Iuka.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bridgeport at 36% compared to 0% in Iuka.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bridgeport at 9% compared to 2% in Iuka.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bridgeport and Iuka at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bridgeport | Iuka |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 15.1% |
| Depression | 18.2% | 26.4% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 25.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 32.7% | 40.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Iuka
- In Iuka, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 17.0% in Bridgeport.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Iuka at 26.4% versus 18.2% in Bridgeport.
- Iuka has a higher smoking rate at 25.7% compared to 18.2% in Bridgeport.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Iuka at 14.6% compared to 13.7% in Bridgeport.
- Iuka has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 32.7% in Bridgeport.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Iuka at 19.0% compared to 15.0% in Bridgeport.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bridgeport | Iuka |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (3,659) | 2.4% (75) |
| High School Diploma | 18.7% (27,806) | 19.9% (616) |
| Less than High School | 23.9% (35,520) | 21.0% (650) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.8% (24,999) | 11.2% (348) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bridgeport vs Iuka
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 2.4% in Iuka.
- In Iuka, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.9% compared to 18.7% in Bridgeport.
- More residents in Bridgeport have less than a high school education at 23.9% compared to 21.0% in Iuka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.8% compared to 11.2% in Iuka.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.