Demographics details for Bridgeport, CT vs Irvington, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bridgeport, CT vs Irvington, AL.
Data | Bridgeport | Irvington |
---|---|---|
Population | 148,377 | 1,335 |
Median Age | 37.5 years | 39.0 years |
Median Income | $54,440 | $43,000 |
Married Families | 29.0% | 54.3% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 22% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Bridgeport vs Irvington
- In Bridgeport, the population is higher at 148,377, compared to 1,335 in Irvington.
- The median age in Irvington is higher at 39.0 years, compared to 37.5 years in Bridgeport.
- Bridgeport has a higher median income of $54,440 compared to $43,000 in Irvington.
- In Irvington, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.3%, compared to 29.0% in Bridgeport.
- The poverty level is higher in Irvington at 22%, compared to 12% in Bridgeport.
- Irvington has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.4% in Bridgeport.
Demographics
Demographics Bridgeport vs Irvington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bridgeport | Irvington |
---|---|---|
Black | 22 | 76.4 |
White | 26 | 18.2 |
Asian | 7 | 0.3 |
Hispanic | 36 | 2.5 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 2.6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Irvington
- In Irvington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 76.4% compared to 22% in Bridgeport.
- Bridgeport has a higher percentage of White residents at 26% compared to 18.2% in Irvington.
- The Asian population is larger in Bridgeport at 7% compared to 0.3% in Irvington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bridgeport at 36% compared to 2.5% in Irvington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bridgeport at 9% compared to 2.6% in Irvington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bridgeport and Irvington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bridgeport | Irvington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 18.2% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 18.2% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 13.7% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 32.7% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Irvington
- More residents in Bridgeport report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Irvington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 18.2% compared to 0.0% in Irvington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 18.2% compared to 0.0% in Irvington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bridgeport at 13.7% compared to 0.0% in Irvington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bridgeport at 32.7% compared to 0.0% in Irvington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bridgeport at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Irvington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bridgeport | Irvington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.5% (3,659) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 18.7% (27,806) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 23.9% (35,520) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.8% (24,999) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bridgeport vs Irvington
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.0% in Irvington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a high school diploma at 18.7% compared to 0.0% in Irvington.
- More residents in Bridgeport have less than a high school education at 23.9% compared to 0.0% in Irvington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.8% compared to 0.0% in Irvington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.