Demographics details for Bridgeport, AL vs South cle elum, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Bridgeport, AL vs South cle elum, WA.

Data Bridgeport South cle elum
Population 2,244 564
Median Age 44.1 years 35.2 years
Median Income $34,000 $56,400
Married Families 33.0% 47.0%
Poverty Level 17% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.0

Population Comparison: Bridgeport vs South cle elum

  • In Bridgeport, the population is higher at 2,244, compared to 564 in South cle elum.
  • Residents in Bridgeport have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 35.2 years in South cle elum.
  • South cle elum has a higher median income of $56,400, compared to $34,000 in Bridgeport.
  • In South cle elum, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 33.0% in Bridgeport.
  • Bridgeport has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 10% in South cle elum.
  • South cle elum has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Bridgeport.

Demographics

Demographics Bridgeport vs South cle elum provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Bridgeport South cle elum
Black 4 Data is updating
White 85 84
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 4 6
Two or More Races 6 10
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Bridgeport vs South cle elum

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bridgeport at 4% compared to 0% in South cle elum.
  • Bridgeport has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 84% in South cle elum.
  • Both Bridgeport and South cle elum have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • South cle elum has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 4% in Bridgeport.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South cle elum at 10%, compared to 6% in Bridgeport.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bridgeport at 1% compared to 0% in South cle elum.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Bridgeport South cle elum
Mental Health Not Good 21.3% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 15.2% 11.9%
Depression 25.7% 26.2%
Smoking 23.7% 16.3%
Binge Drinking 14.7% 18.3%
Obesity 39.9% 31.0%
Disability Percentage 27.0% 26.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Bridgeport vs South cle elum

  • More residents in Bridgeport report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 17.8% in South cle elum.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in South cle elum at 26.2% versus 25.7% in Bridgeport.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 23.7% compared to 16.3% in South cle elum.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in South cle elum at 18.3% compared to 14.7% in Bridgeport.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Bridgeport at 39.9% compared to 31.0% in South cle elum.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Bridgeport at 27.0% compared to 26.0% in South cle elum.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Bridgeport South cle elum
No Schooling 5.5% (123) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 23.8% (534) 22.2% (125)
Less than High School 26.3% (590) 21.6% (122)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 6.5% (146) 20.6% (116)

Education Levels Comparison: Bridgeport vs South cle elum

  • A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport have no formal schooling at 5.5% compared to 0.0% in South cle elum.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a high school diploma at 23.8% compared to 22.2% in South cle elum.
  • More residents in Bridgeport have less than a high school education at 26.3% compared to 21.6% in South cle elum.
  • In South cle elum, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.6% compared to 6.5% in Bridgeport.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.