Demographics details for Bridgeport, AL vs Seymour, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bridgeport, AL vs Seymour, IN.
Data | Bridgeport | Seymour |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,244 | 21,618 |
Median Age | 44.1 years | 34.5 years |
Median Income | $34,000 | $57,347 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 17% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Bridgeport vs Seymour
- The population in Seymour is higher at 21,618, compared to 2,244 in Bridgeport.
- Residents in Bridgeport have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 34.5 years in Seymour.
- Seymour has a higher median income of $57,347, compared to $34,000 in Bridgeport.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bridgeport at 33.0% compared to 32.0% in Seymour.
- Bridgeport has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 12% in Seymour.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Bridgeport and Seymour at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Bridgeport vs Seymour provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bridgeport | Seymour |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 2 |
White | 85 | 68 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | 4 | 15 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 11 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Seymour
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bridgeport at 4% compared to 2% in Seymour.
- Bridgeport has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 68% in Seymour.
- In Seymour, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Bridgeport.
- Seymour has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 4% in Bridgeport.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Seymour at 11%, compared to 6% in Bridgeport.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bridgeport and Seymour at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bridgeport | Seymour |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.3% | 18.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.2% | 12.9% |
Depression | 25.7% | 26.9% |
Smoking | 23.7% | 21.5% |
Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 16.3% |
Obesity | 39.9% | 42.2% |
Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Seymour
- More residents in Bridgeport report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 18.0% in Seymour.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Seymour at 26.9% versus 25.7% in Bridgeport.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 23.7% compared to 21.5% in Seymour.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Seymour at 16.3% compared to 14.7% in Bridgeport.
- Seymour has higher obesity rates at 42.2% compared to 39.9% in Bridgeport.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bridgeport at 27.0% compared to 15.0% in Seymour.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bridgeport | Seymour |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 5.5% (123) | 1.6% (348) |
High School Diploma | 23.8% (534) | 20.2% (4,374) |
Less than High School | 26.3% (590) | 17.4% (3,765) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.5% (146) | 12.2% (2,648) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bridgeport vs Seymour
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport have no formal schooling at 5.5% compared to 1.6% in Seymour.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a high school diploma at 23.8% compared to 20.2% in Seymour.
- More residents in Bridgeport have less than a high school education at 26.3% compared to 17.4% in Seymour.
- In Seymour, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.2% compared to 6.5% in Bridgeport.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.