Demographics details for Bridgeport, AL vs Mount vernon, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Bridgeport, AL vs Mount vernon, TX.

Data Bridgeport Mount vernon
Population 2,244 2,541
Median Age 44.1 years 31.1 years
Median Income $34,000 $63,750
Married Families 33.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 17% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.5

Population Comparison: Bridgeport vs Mount vernon

  • The population in Mount vernon is higher at 2,541, compared to 2,244 in Bridgeport.
  • Residents in Bridgeport have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 31.1 years in Mount vernon.
  • Mount vernon has a higher median income of $63,750, compared to $34,000 in Bridgeport.
  • In Mount vernon, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 33.0% in Bridgeport.
  • Bridgeport has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 10% in Mount vernon.
  • Mount vernon has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Bridgeport.

Demographics

Demographics Bridgeport vs Mount vernon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Bridgeport Mount vernon
Black 4 15
White 85 50
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 4 21
Two or More Races 6 14
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Mount vernon

  • In Mount vernon, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 4% in Bridgeport.
  • Bridgeport has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 50% in Mount vernon.
  • Both Bridgeport and Mount vernon have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Mount vernon has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 4% in Bridgeport.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mount vernon at 14%, compared to 6% in Bridgeport.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bridgeport at 1% compared to 0% in Mount vernon.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Bridgeport Mount vernon
Mental Health Not Good 21.3% 18.1%
Physical Health Not Good 15.2% 11.8%
Depression 25.7% 24.9%
Smoking 23.7% 17.6%
Binge Drinking 14.7% 18.5%
Obesity 39.9% 35.4%
Disability Percentage 27.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Mount vernon

  • More residents in Bridgeport report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 18.1% in Mount vernon.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 25.7% compared to 24.9% in Mount vernon.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 23.7% compared to 17.6% in Mount vernon.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Mount vernon at 18.5% compared to 14.7% in Bridgeport.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Bridgeport at 39.9% compared to 35.4% in Mount vernon.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Bridgeport at 27.0% compared to 17.0% in Mount vernon.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Bridgeport Mount vernon
No Schooling 5.5% (123) 0.6% (16)
High School Diploma 23.8% (534) 15.7% (399)
Less than High School 26.3% (590) 21.8% (555)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 6.5% (146) 11.1% (282)

Education Levels Comparison: Bridgeport vs Mount vernon

  • A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport have no formal schooling at 5.5% compared to 0.6% in Mount vernon.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a high school diploma at 23.8% compared to 15.7% in Mount vernon.
  • More residents in Bridgeport have less than a high school education at 26.3% compared to 21.8% in Mount vernon.
  • In Mount vernon, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.1% compared to 6.5% in Bridgeport.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.