Demographics details for Bridgeport, AL vs Menomonee falls, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Bridgeport, AL vs Menomonee falls, WI.

Data Bridgeport Menomonee falls
Population 2,244 39,246
Median Age 44.1 years 41.9 years
Median Income $34,000 $96,986
Married Families 33.0% 46.0%
Poverty Level 17% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 2.8

Population Comparison: Bridgeport vs Menomonee falls

  • The population in Menomonee falls is higher at 39,246, compared to 2,244 in Bridgeport.
  • Residents in Bridgeport have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 41.9 years in Menomonee falls.
  • Menomonee falls has a higher median income of $96,986, compared to $34,000 in Bridgeport.
  • In Menomonee falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 33.0% in Bridgeport.
  • Bridgeport has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 5% in Menomonee falls.
  • The unemployment rate in Bridgeport is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.8% in Menomonee falls.

Demographics

Demographics Bridgeport vs Menomonee falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Bridgeport Menomonee falls
Black 4 4
White 85 82
Asian Data is updating 5
Hispanic 4 5
Two or More Races 6 4
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Menomonee falls

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Bridgeport and Menomonee falls at 4%.
  • Bridgeport has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 82% in Menomonee falls.
  • In Menomonee falls, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Bridgeport.
  • Menomonee falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 4% in Bridgeport.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Bridgeport at 6% compared to 4% in Menomonee falls.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bridgeport at 1% compared to 0% in Menomonee falls.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Bridgeport Menomonee falls
Mental Health Not Good 21.3% 12.7%
Physical Health Not Good 15.2% 7.7%
Depression 25.7% 20.0%
Smoking 23.7% 11.6%
Binge Drinking 14.7% 25.0%
Obesity 39.9% 33.4%
Disability Percentage 27.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Menomonee falls

  • More residents in Bridgeport report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 12.7% in Menomonee falls.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 25.7% compared to 20.0% in Menomonee falls.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 23.7% compared to 11.6% in Menomonee falls.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Menomonee falls at 25.0% compared to 14.7% in Bridgeport.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Bridgeport at 39.9% compared to 33.4% in Menomonee falls.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Bridgeport at 27.0% compared to 10.0% in Menomonee falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Bridgeport Menomonee falls
No Schooling 5.5% (123) 0.3% (117)
High School Diploma 23.8% (534) 14.9% (5,834)
Less than High School 26.3% (590) 4.9% (1,936)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 6.5% (146) 33.4% (13,122)

Education Levels Comparison: Bridgeport vs Menomonee falls

  • A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport have no formal schooling at 5.5% compared to 0.3% in Menomonee falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a high school diploma at 23.8% compared to 14.9% in Menomonee falls.
  • More residents in Bridgeport have less than a high school education at 26.3% compared to 4.9% in Menomonee falls.
  • In Menomonee falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.4% compared to 6.5% in Bridgeport.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.