Demographics details for Bridgeport, AL vs El dorado, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bridgeport, AL vs El dorado, AR.
Data | Bridgeport | El dorado |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,244 | 17,063 |
Median Age | 44.1 years | 36.4 years |
Median Income | $34,000 | $46,869 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 17% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Bridgeport vs El dorado
- The population in El dorado is higher at 17,063, compared to 2,244 in Bridgeport.
- Residents in Bridgeport have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 36.4 years in El dorado.
- El dorado has a higher median income of $46,869, compared to $34,000 in Bridgeport.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bridgeport at 33.0% compared to 32.0% in El dorado.
- The poverty level is higher in El dorado at 18%, compared to 17% in Bridgeport.
- El dorado has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Bridgeport.
Demographics
Demographics Bridgeport vs El dorado provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bridgeport | El dorado |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 50 |
White | 85 | 41 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 4 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 3 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bridgeport vs El dorado
- In El dorado, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 50% compared to 4% in Bridgeport.
- Bridgeport has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 41% in El dorado.
- In El dorado, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Bridgeport.
- El dorado has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 4% in Bridgeport.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bridgeport at 6% compared to 3% in El dorado.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bridgeport at 1% compared to 0% in El dorado.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bridgeport | El dorado |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.3% | 19.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.2% | 14.7% |
Depression | 25.7% | 24.5% |
Smoking | 23.7% | 21.9% |
Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 12.5% |
Obesity | 39.9% | 40.9% |
Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bridgeport vs El dorado
- More residents in Bridgeport report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 19.9% in El dorado.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 25.7% compared to 24.5% in El dorado.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 23.7% compared to 21.9% in El dorado.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bridgeport at 14.7% compared to 12.5% in El dorado.
- El dorado has higher obesity rates at 40.9% compared to 39.9% in Bridgeport.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bridgeport at 27.0% compared to 17.0% in El dorado.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bridgeport | El dorado |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 5.5% (123) | 0.6% (101) |
High School Diploma | 23.8% (534) | 22.0% (3,750) |
Less than High School | 26.3% (590) | 14.8% (2,520) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.5% (146) | 13.2% (2,245) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bridgeport vs El dorado
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport have no formal schooling at 5.5% compared to 0.6% in El dorado.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a high school diploma at 23.8% compared to 22.0% in El dorado.
- More residents in Bridgeport have less than a high school education at 26.3% compared to 14.8% in El dorado.
- In El dorado, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.2% compared to 6.5% in Bridgeport.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.