Demographics details for Bridgeport, AL vs Cedar hill, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bridgeport, AL vs Cedar hill, TX.
| Data | Bridgeport | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,244 | 48,341 |
| Median Age | 44.1 years | 35.3 years |
| Median Income | $34,000 | $84,132 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 17% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Bridgeport vs Cedar hill
- The population in Cedar hill is higher at 48,341, compared to 2,244 in Bridgeport.
- Residents in Bridgeport have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 35.3 years in Cedar hill.
- Cedar hill has a higher median income of $84,132, compared to $34,000 in Bridgeport.
- In Cedar hill, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 33.0% in Bridgeport.
- Bridgeport has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 9% in Cedar hill.
- Cedar hill has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.5% in Bridgeport.
Demographics
Demographics Bridgeport vs Cedar hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bridgeport | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 51 |
| White | 85 | 11 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 27 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Cedar hill
- In Cedar hill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 51% compared to 4% in Bridgeport.
- Bridgeport has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 11% in Cedar hill.
- In Cedar hill, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Bridgeport.
- Cedar hill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 4% in Bridgeport.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cedar hill at 9%, compared to 6% in Bridgeport.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bridgeport at 1% compared to 0% in Cedar hill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bridgeport | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.3% | 16.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.2% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 25.7% | 20.5% |
| Smoking | 23.7% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 35.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Cedar hill
- More residents in Bridgeport report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 16.1% in Cedar hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 25.7% compared to 20.5% in Cedar hill.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 23.7% compared to 14.8% in Cedar hill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar hill at 17.7% compared to 14.7% in Bridgeport.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bridgeport at 39.9% compared to 35.9% in Cedar hill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bridgeport at 27.0% compared to 11.0% in Cedar hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bridgeport | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 5.5% (123) | 1.2% (578) |
| High School Diploma | 23.8% (534) | 13.4% (6,465) |
| Less than High School | 26.3% (590) | 10.2% (4,909) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.5% (146) | 18.4% (8,890) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bridgeport vs Cedar hill
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport have no formal schooling at 5.5% compared to 1.2% in Cedar hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a high school diploma at 23.8% compared to 13.4% in Cedar hill.
- More residents in Bridgeport have less than a high school education at 26.3% compared to 10.2% in Cedar hill.
- In Cedar hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 6.5% in Bridgeport.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.