Demographics details for Bridgeport, AL vs Cassatt, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bridgeport, AL vs Cassatt, SC.
| Data | Bridgeport | Cassatt |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,244 | 1,000 |
| Median Age | 44.1 years | 36.0 years |
| Median Income | $34,000 | $55,000 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 65.0% |
| Poverty Level | 17% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Bridgeport vs Cassatt
- In Bridgeport, the population is higher at 2,244, compared to 1,000 in Cassatt.
- Residents in Bridgeport have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 36.0 years in Cassatt.
- Cassatt has a higher median income of $55,000, compared to $34,000 in Bridgeport.
- In Cassatt, the percentage of married families is higher at 65.0%, compared to 33.0% in Bridgeport.
- Bridgeport has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 12% in Cassatt.
- Cassatt has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.5% in Bridgeport.
Demographics
Demographics Bridgeport vs Cassatt provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bridgeport | Cassatt |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 10 |
| White | 85 | 85 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 1 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Cassatt
- In Cassatt, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 4% in Bridgeport.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Bridgeport and Cassatt at 85%.
- In Cassatt, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Bridgeport.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bridgeport at 4% compared to 2% in Cassatt.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bridgeport at 6% compared to 1% in Cassatt.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bridgeport at 1% compared to 0% in Cassatt.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bridgeport | Cassatt |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.3% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.2% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 25.7% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 23.7% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Cassatt
- More residents in Bridgeport report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 0.0% in Cassatt.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 25.7% compared to 0.0% in Cassatt.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 23.7% compared to 0.0% in Cassatt.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bridgeport at 14.7% compared to 0.0% in Cassatt.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bridgeport at 39.9% compared to 0.0% in Cassatt.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bridgeport at 27.0% compared to 0.0% in Cassatt.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bridgeport | Cassatt |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 5.5% (123) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 23.8% (534) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 26.3% (590) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.5% (146) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bridgeport vs Cassatt
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport have no formal schooling at 5.5% compared to 0.0% in Cassatt.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a high school diploma at 23.8% compared to 0.0% in Cassatt.
- More residents in Bridgeport have less than a high school education at 26.3% compared to 0.0% in Cassatt.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 6.5% compared to 0.0% in Cassatt.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.