Demographics details for Brentwood, NY vs Coalinga, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Brentwood, NY vs Coalinga, CA.
| Data | Brentwood | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 65,042 | 17,024 |
| Median Age | 36.1 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $111,572 | $68,976 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Brentwood vs Coalinga
- In Brentwood, the population is higher at 65,042, compared to 17,024 in Coalinga.
- Residents in Brentwood have a higher median age of 36.1 years compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
- Brentwood has a higher median income of $111,572 compared to $68,976 in Coalinga.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Brentwood at 32.0% compared to 31.0% in Coalinga.
- The poverty level is higher in Coalinga at 15%, compared to 5% in Brentwood.
- Coalinga has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 4.2% in Brentwood.
Demographics
Demographics Brentwood vs Coalinga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Brentwood | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 16 | 4 |
| White | 25 | 9 |
| Asian | 3 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 73 | 65 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 18 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Brentwood vs Coalinga
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Brentwood at 16% compared to 4% in Coalinga.
- Brentwood has a higher percentage of White residents at 25% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- The Asian population is larger in Brentwood at 3% compared to 2% in Coalinga.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Brentwood at 73% compared to 65% in Coalinga.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Coalinga at 18%, compared to 15% in Brentwood.
- In Coalinga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Brentwood.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Brentwood | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 17.4% | 16.4% |
| Smoking | 15.1% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.3% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 35.4% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Brentwood vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.0% in Brentwood.
- Depression is more prevalent in Brentwood at 17.4% compared to 16.4% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 15.1% in Brentwood.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Coalinga at 15.9% compared to 14.3% in Brentwood.
- Coalinga has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 35.4% in Brentwood.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Coalinga at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Brentwood.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Brentwood | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 9.2% (6,002) | 3.2% (537) |
| High School Diploma | 17.5% (11,383) | 13.8% (2,349) |
| Less than High School | 39.0% (25,352) | 39.2% (6,672) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (7,598) | 8.1% (1,380) |
Education Levels Comparison: Brentwood vs Coalinga
- A higher percentage of residents in Brentwood have no formal schooling at 9.2% compared to 3.2% in Coalinga.
- A higher percentage of residents in Brentwood hold a high school diploma at 17.5% compared to 13.8% in Coalinga.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Coalinga at 39.2%, compared to 39.0% in Brentwood.
- A higher percentage of residents in Brentwood hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.7% compared to 8.1% in Coalinga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.