Demographics details for Breckenridge, TX vs Pulaski, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Breckenridge, TX vs Pulaski, VA.
Data | Breckenridge | Pulaski |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,177 | 33,706 |
Median Age | 35.1 years | 47.2 years |
Median Income | $38,500 | $59,740 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Breckenridge vs Pulaski
- The population in Pulaski is higher at 33,706, compared to 5,177 in Breckenridge.
- The median age in Pulaski is higher at 47.2 years, compared to 35.1 years in Breckenridge.
- Pulaski has a higher median income of $59,740, compared to $38,500 in Breckenridge.
- In Pulaski, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 33.0% in Breckenridge.
- Breckenridge has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Pulaski.
- The unemployment rate in Breckenridge is higher at 4.2%, compared to 2.9% in Pulaski.
Demographics
Demographics Breckenridge vs Pulaski provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Breckenridge | Pulaski |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 5 |
White | 42 | 90 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 39 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 2 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Breckenridge vs Pulaski
- In Pulaski, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 3% in Breckenridge.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pulaski at 90% compared to 42% in Breckenridge.
- The Asian population is larger in Breckenridge at 2% compared to 1% in Pulaski.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Breckenridge at 39% compared to 2% in Pulaski.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Breckenridge at 13% compared to 2% in Pulaski.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Breckenridge at 1% compared to 0% in Pulaski.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Breckenridge | Pulaski |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 17.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 11.6% |
Depression | 25.6% | 24.8% |
Smoking | 21.1% | 18.5% |
Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 18.2% |
Obesity | 38.0% | 37.7% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Breckenridge vs Pulaski
- More residents in Breckenridge report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 17.7% in Pulaski.
- Depression is more prevalent in Breckenridge at 25.6% compared to 24.8% in Pulaski.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Breckenridge at 21.1% compared to 18.5% in Pulaski.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pulaski at 18.2% compared to 17.5% in Breckenridge.
- Obesity rates are higher in Breckenridge at 38.0% compared to 37.7% in Pulaski.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pulaski at 20.0% compared to 18.0% in Breckenridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Breckenridge | Pulaski |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.4% (126) | 1.0% (331) |
High School Diploma | 14.7% (763) | 21.0% (7,088) |
Less than High School | 26.3% (1,361) | 14.0% (4,706) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (477) | 16.0% (5,382) |
Education Levels Comparison: Breckenridge vs Pulaski
- A higher percentage of residents in Breckenridge have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 1.0% in Pulaski.
- In Pulaski, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.0% compared to 14.7% in Breckenridge.
- More residents in Breckenridge have less than a high school education at 26.3% compared to 14.0% in Pulaski.
- In Pulaski, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 9.2% in Breckenridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.