Demographics details for Breckenridge, TX vs Port huron, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Breckenridge, TX vs Port huron, MI.
Data | Breckenridge | Port huron |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,177 | 28,626 |
Median Age | 35.1 years | 39.0 years |
Median Income | $38,500 | $47,906 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 7.0 |
Population Comparison: Breckenridge vs Port huron
- The population in Port huron is higher at 28,626, compared to 5,177 in Breckenridge.
- The median age in Port huron is higher at 39.0 years, compared to 35.1 years in Breckenridge.
- Port huron has a higher median income of $47,906, compared to $38,500 in Breckenridge.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Breckenridge at 33.0% compared to 30.0% in Port huron.
- The poverty level is identical in both Breckenridge and Port huron at 15%.
- Port huron has a higher unemployment rate at 7.0% compared to 4.2% in Breckenridge.
Demographics
Demographics Breckenridge vs Port huron provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Breckenridge | Port huron |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 8 |
White | 42 | 76 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 39 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 8 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Breckenridge vs Port huron
- In Port huron, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 3% in Breckenridge.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Port huron at 76% compared to 42% in Breckenridge.
- The Asian population is larger in Breckenridge at 2% compared to 1% in Port huron.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Breckenridge at 39% compared to 7% in Port huron.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Breckenridge at 13% compared to 8% in Port huron.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Breckenridge at 1% compared to 0% in Port huron.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Breckenridge | Port huron |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 20.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 15.0% |
Depression | 25.6% | 28.2% |
Smoking | 21.1% | 25.7% |
Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 16.7% |
Obesity | 38.0% | 40.5% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Breckenridge vs Port huron
- In Port huron, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 19.5% in Breckenridge.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Port huron at 28.2% versus 25.6% in Breckenridge.
- Port huron has a higher smoking rate at 25.7% compared to 21.1% in Breckenridge.
- Binge drinking is more common in Breckenridge at 17.5% compared to 16.7% in Port huron.
- Port huron has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 38.0% in Breckenridge.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Port huron at 22.0% compared to 18.0% in Breckenridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Breckenridge | Port huron |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.4% (126) | 0.6% (172) |
High School Diploma | 14.7% (763) | 19.5% (5,596) |
Less than High School | 26.3% (1,361) | 13.5% (3,870) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (477) | 12.8% (3,662) |
Education Levels Comparison: Breckenridge vs Port huron
- A higher percentage of residents in Breckenridge have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.6% in Port huron.
- In Port huron, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.5% compared to 14.7% in Breckenridge.
- More residents in Breckenridge have less than a high school education at 26.3% compared to 13.5% in Port huron.
- In Port huron, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.8% compared to 9.2% in Breckenridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.