Demographics details for Breckenridge, TX vs Pittsford, VT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Breckenridge, TX vs Pittsford, VT.

Data Breckenridge Pittsford
Population 5,177 2,807
Median Age 35.1 years 42.0 years
Median Income $38,500 $65,000
Married Families 33.0% 60.0%
Poverty Level 15% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 1.7

Population Comparison: Breckenridge vs Pittsford

  • In Breckenridge, the population is higher at 5,177, compared to 2,807 in Pittsford.
  • The median age in Pittsford is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 35.1 years in Breckenridge.
  • Pittsford has a higher median income of $65,000, compared to $38,500 in Breckenridge.
  • In Pittsford, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 33.0% in Breckenridge.
  • Breckenridge has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 5% in Pittsford.
  • The unemployment rate in Breckenridge is higher at 4.2%, compared to 1.7% in Pittsford.

Demographics

Demographics Breckenridge vs Pittsford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Breckenridge Pittsford
Black 3 Data is updating
White 42 97
Asian 2 1
Hispanic 39 1
Two or More Races 13 1
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Breckenridge vs Pittsford

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Breckenridge at 3% compared to 0% in Pittsford.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Pittsford at 97% compared to 42% in Breckenridge.
  • The Asian population is larger in Breckenridge at 2% compared to 1% in Pittsford.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Breckenridge at 39% compared to 1% in Pittsford.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Breckenridge at 13% compared to 1% in Pittsford.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Breckenridge at 1% compared to 0% in Pittsford.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Breckenridge Pittsford
Mental Health Not Good 19.5% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 14.2% Data is updating%
Depression 25.6% Data is updating%
Smoking 21.1% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 17.5% Data is updating%
Obesity 38.0% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 18.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Breckenridge vs Pittsford

  • More residents in Breckenridge report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Breckenridge at 25.6% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Breckenridge at 21.1% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Breckenridge at 17.5% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Breckenridge at 38.0% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Breckenridge at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Breckenridge Pittsford
No Schooling 2.4% (126) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 14.7% (763) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 26.3% (1,361) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.2% (477) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Breckenridge vs Pittsford

  • A higher percentage of residents in Breckenridge have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Breckenridge hold a high school diploma at 14.7% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
  • More residents in Breckenridge have less than a high school education at 26.3% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Breckenridge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.2% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.