Demographics details for Breckenridge, TX vs Mcdonough, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Breckenridge, TX vs Mcdonough, GA.
| Data | Breckenridge | Mcdonough |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,177 | 30,340 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 31.0 years |
| Median Income | $38,500 | $77,804 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.9 |
Population Comparison: Breckenridge vs Mcdonough
- The population in Mcdonough is higher at 30,340, compared to 5,177 in Breckenridge.
- Residents in Breckenridge have a higher median age of 35.1 years compared to 31.0 years in Mcdonough.
- Mcdonough has a higher median income of $77,804, compared to $38,500 in Breckenridge.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Breckenridge at 33.0% compared to 31.0% in Mcdonough.
- Breckenridge has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 13% in Mcdonough.
- Mcdonough has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 4.2% in Breckenridge.
Demographics
Demographics Breckenridge vs Mcdonough provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Breckenridge | Mcdonough |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 70 |
| White | 42 | 14 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 39 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Breckenridge vs Mcdonough
- In Mcdonough, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 3% in Breckenridge.
- Breckenridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 42% compared to 14% in Mcdonough.
- Both Breckenridge and Mcdonough have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Breckenridge at 39% compared to 6% in Mcdonough.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Breckenridge at 13% compared to 8% in Mcdonough.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Breckenridge at 1% compared to 0% in Mcdonough.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Breckenridge | Mcdonough |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 25.6% | 19.6% |
| Smoking | 21.1% | 16.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 38.0% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Breckenridge vs Mcdonough
- More residents in Breckenridge report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 16.4% in Mcdonough.
- Depression is more prevalent in Breckenridge at 25.6% compared to 19.6% in Mcdonough.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Breckenridge at 21.1% compared to 16.1% in Mcdonough.
- Binge drinking is more common in Breckenridge at 17.5% compared to 15.1% in Mcdonough.
- Mcdonough has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 38.0% in Breckenridge.
- Disability percentages are higher in Breckenridge at 18.0% compared to 7.0% in Mcdonough.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Breckenridge | Mcdonough |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.4% (126) | 0.7% (221) |
| High School Diploma | 14.7% (763) | 14.8% (4,501) |
| Less than High School | 26.3% (1,361) | 4.9% (1,500) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (477) | 16.1% (4,882) |
Education Levels Comparison: Breckenridge vs Mcdonough
- A higher percentage of residents in Breckenridge have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.7% in Mcdonough.
- In Mcdonough, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.8% compared to 14.7% in Breckenridge.
- More residents in Breckenridge have less than a high school education at 26.3% compared to 4.9% in Mcdonough.
- In Mcdonough, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.1% compared to 9.2% in Breckenridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.