Demographics details for Breckenridge, TX vs Coconut creek, FL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Breckenridge, TX vs Coconut creek, FL.

Data Breckenridge Coconut creek
Population 5,177 57,348
Median Age 35.1 years 42.4 years
Median Income $38,500 $72,740
Married Families 33.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 15% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.2

Population Comparison: Breckenridge vs Coconut creek

  • The population in Coconut creek is higher at 57,348, compared to 5,177 in Breckenridge.
  • The median age in Coconut creek is higher at 42.4 years, compared to 35.1 years in Breckenridge.
  • Coconut creek has a higher median income of $72,740, compared to $38,500 in Breckenridge.
  • In Coconut creek, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 33.0% in Breckenridge.
  • Breckenridge has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Coconut creek.
  • The unemployment rate in Breckenridge is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Coconut creek.

Demographics

Demographics Breckenridge vs Coconut creek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Breckenridge Coconut creek
Black 3 15
White 42 39
Asian 2 3
Hispanic 39 27
Two or More Races 13 16
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Breckenridge vs Coconut creek

  • In Coconut creek, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 3% in Breckenridge.
  • Breckenridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 42% compared to 39% in Coconut creek.
  • In Coconut creek, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Breckenridge.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Breckenridge at 39% compared to 27% in Coconut creek.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Coconut creek at 16%, compared to 13% in Breckenridge.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Breckenridge at 1% compared to 0% in Coconut creek.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Breckenridge Coconut creek
Mental Health Not Good 19.5% 15.4%
Physical Health Not Good 14.2% 9.9%
Depression 25.6% 17.8%
Smoking 21.1% 16.2%
Binge Drinking 17.5% 15.6%
Obesity 38.0% 27.5%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Breckenridge vs Coconut creek

  • More residents in Breckenridge report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 15.4% in Coconut creek.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Breckenridge at 25.6% compared to 17.8% in Coconut creek.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Breckenridge at 21.1% compared to 16.2% in Coconut creek.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Breckenridge at 17.5% compared to 15.6% in Coconut creek.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Breckenridge at 38.0% compared to 27.5% in Coconut creek.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Breckenridge at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Coconut creek.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Breckenridge Coconut creek
No Schooling 2.4% (126) 1.4% (831)
High School Diploma 14.7% (763) 16.6% (9,506)
Less than High School 26.3% (1,361) 8.9% (5,111)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.2% (477) 26.5% (15,196)

Education Levels Comparison: Breckenridge vs Coconut creek

  • A higher percentage of residents in Breckenridge have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 1.4% in Coconut creek.
  • In Coconut creek, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.6% compared to 14.7% in Breckenridge.
  • More residents in Breckenridge have less than a high school education at 26.3% compared to 8.9% in Coconut creek.
  • In Coconut creek, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.5% compared to 9.2% in Breckenridge.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.