Demographics details for Breckenridge, TX vs Cambridge, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Breckenridge, TX vs Cambridge, OH.
Data | Breckenridge | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,177 | 9,985 |
Median Age | 35.1 years | 35.1 years |
Median Income | $38,500 | $39,589 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Breckenridge vs Cambridge
- The population in Cambridge is higher at 9,985, compared to 5,177 in Breckenridge.
- The median age is the same in both Breckenridge and Cambridge at 35.1 years.
- Cambridge has a higher median income of $39,589, compared to $38,500 in Breckenridge.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Breckenridge at 33.0% compared to 28.0% in Cambridge.
- The poverty level is higher in Cambridge at 16%, compared to 15% in Breckenridge.
- Cambridge has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Breckenridge.
Demographics
Demographics Breckenridge vs Cambridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Breckenridge | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 6 |
White | 42 | 88 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 39 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Breckenridge vs Cambridge
- In Cambridge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 3% in Breckenridge.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cambridge at 88% compared to 42% in Breckenridge.
- The Asian population is larger in Breckenridge at 2% compared to 0% in Cambridge.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Breckenridge at 39% compared to 2% in Cambridge.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Breckenridge at 13% compared to 4% in Cambridge.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Breckenridge at 1% compared to 0% in Cambridge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Breckenridge | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 20.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 15.1% |
Depression | 25.6% | 25.9% |
Smoking | 21.1% | 26.2% |
Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 38.0% | 46.4% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Breckenridge vs Cambridge
- In Cambridge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 19.5% in Breckenridge.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cambridge at 25.9% versus 25.6% in Breckenridge.
- Cambridge has a higher smoking rate at 26.2% compared to 21.1% in Breckenridge.
- Binge drinking is more common in Breckenridge at 17.5% compared to 16.9% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has higher obesity rates at 46.4% compared to 38.0% in Breckenridge.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cambridge at 19.0% compared to 18.0% in Breckenridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Breckenridge | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.4% (126) | 0.7% (73) |
High School Diploma | 14.7% (763) | 25.1% (2,502) |
Less than High School | 26.3% (1,361) | 17.3% (1,732) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (477) | 8.8% (875) |
Education Levels Comparison: Breckenridge vs Cambridge
- A higher percentage of residents in Breckenridge have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.7% in Cambridge.
- In Cambridge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.1% compared to 14.7% in Breckenridge.
- More residents in Breckenridge have less than a high school education at 26.3% compared to 17.3% in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Breckenridge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.2% compared to 8.8% in Cambridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.