Demographics details for Breckenridge, MN vs Tea, SD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Breckenridge, MN vs Tea, SD.
| Data | Breckenridge | Tea |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,348 | 6,918 |
| Median Age | 41.3 years | 30.2 years |
| Median Income | $57,094 | $99,153 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Breckenridge vs Tea
- The population in Tea is higher at 6,918, compared to 3,348 in Breckenridge.
- Residents in Breckenridge have a higher median age of 41.3 years compared to 30.2 years in Tea.
- Tea has a higher median income of $99,153, compared to $57,094 in Breckenridge.
- In Tea, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 33.0% in Breckenridge.
- Breckenridge has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Tea.
- The unemployment rate in Breckenridge is higher at 5.2%, compared to 2.5% in Tea.
Demographics
Demographics Breckenridge vs Tea provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Breckenridge | Tea |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 95 | 95 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Breckenridge vs Tea
- In Tea, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Breckenridge.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Breckenridge and Tea at 95%.
- In Tea, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Breckenridge.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Breckenridge at 3% compared to 0% in Tea.
- Both Breckenridge and Tea have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 2%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Breckenridge and Tea at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Breckenridge | Tea |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 11.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 7.7% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 16.6% |
| Smoking | 16.8% | 12.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.8% | 21.6% |
| Obesity | 38.6% | 34.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 4.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Breckenridge vs Tea
- More residents in Breckenridge report poor mental health at 14.7% compared to 11.3% in Tea.
- Depression is more prevalent in Breckenridge at 22.6% compared to 16.6% in Tea.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Breckenridge at 16.8% compared to 12.6% in Tea.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Tea at 21.6% compared to 20.8% in Breckenridge.
- Obesity rates are higher in Breckenridge at 38.6% compared to 34.5% in Tea.
- Disability percentages are higher in Breckenridge at 18.0% compared to 4.0% in Tea.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Breckenridge | Tea |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (37) | 0.1% (10) |
| High School Diploma | 19.8% (662) | 7.8% (537) |
| Less than High School | 11.7% (392) | 1.6% (108) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.4% (616) | 19.9% (1,378) |
Education Levels Comparison: Breckenridge vs Tea
- A higher percentage of residents in Breckenridge have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.1% in Tea.
- A higher percentage of residents in Breckenridge hold a high school diploma at 19.8% compared to 7.8% in Tea.
- More residents in Breckenridge have less than a high school education at 11.7% compared to 1.6% in Tea.
- In Tea, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 18.4% in Breckenridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.