Demographics details for Breckenridge, MN vs Big sky, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Breckenridge, MN vs Big sky, MT.
| Data | Breckenridge | Big sky |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,348 | 2,825 |
| Median Age | 41.3 years | 37.2 years |
| Median Income | $57,094 | $94,176 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Breckenridge vs Big sky
- In Breckenridge, the population is higher at 3,348, compared to 2,825 in Big sky.
- Residents in Breckenridge have a higher median age of 41.3 years compared to 37.2 years in Big sky.
- Big sky has a higher median income of $94,176, compared to $57,094 in Breckenridge.
- In Big sky, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 33.0% in Breckenridge.
- Breckenridge has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Big sky.
- The unemployment rate in Breckenridge is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.5% in Big sky.
Demographics
Demographics Breckenridge vs Big sky provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Breckenridge | Big sky |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 95 | 85 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Breckenridge vs Big sky
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Breckenridge and Big sky at 0%.
- Breckenridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 85% in Big sky.
- Both Breckenridge and Big sky have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Big sky has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 3% in Breckenridge.
- Both Breckenridge and Big sky have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 2%.
- In Big sky, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Breckenridge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Breckenridge | Big sky |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 12.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 8.0% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 20.6% |
| Smoking | 16.8% | 10.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.8% | 24.3% |
| Obesity | 38.6% | 24.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Breckenridge vs Big sky
- More residents in Breckenridge report poor mental health at 14.7% compared to 12.8% in Big sky.
- Depression is more prevalent in Breckenridge at 22.6% compared to 20.6% in Big sky.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Breckenridge at 16.8% compared to 10.7% in Big sky.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Big sky at 24.3% compared to 20.8% in Breckenridge.
- Obesity rates are higher in Breckenridge at 38.6% compared to 24.1% in Big sky.
- Disability percentages are higher in Breckenridge at 18.0% compared to 5.0% in Big sky.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Breckenridge | Big sky |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (37) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 19.8% (662) | 10.1% (284) |
| Less than High School | 11.7% (392) | 4.2% (118) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.4% (616) | 44.6% (1,261) |
Education Levels Comparison: Breckenridge vs Big sky
- A higher percentage of residents in Breckenridge have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Big sky.
- A higher percentage of residents in Breckenridge hold a high school diploma at 19.8% compared to 10.1% in Big sky.
- More residents in Breckenridge have less than a high school education at 11.7% compared to 4.2% in Big sky.
- In Big sky, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.6% compared to 18.4% in Breckenridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.