Demographics details for Breckenridge, MN vs Auburn, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Breckenridge, MN vs Auburn, AL.
| Data | Breckenridge | Auburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,348 | 80,006 |
| Median Age | 41.3 years | 25.9 years |
| Median Income | $57,094 | $55,509 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Breckenridge vs Auburn
- The population in Auburn is higher at 80,006, compared to 3,348 in Breckenridge.
- Residents in Breckenridge have a higher median age of 41.3 years compared to 25.9 years in Auburn.
- Breckenridge has a higher median income of $57,094 compared to $55,509 in Auburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Breckenridge at 33.0% compared to 32.0% in Auburn.
- The poverty level is identical in both Breckenridge and Auburn at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Breckenridge is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.0% in Auburn.
Demographics
Demographics Breckenridge vs Auburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Breckenridge | Auburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 17 |
| White | 95 | 69 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 8 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Breckenridge vs Auburn
- In Auburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 0% in Breckenridge.
- Breckenridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 69% in Auburn.
- In Auburn, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 0% in Breckenridge.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Breckenridge and Auburn at 3%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Auburn at 3%, compared to 2% in Breckenridge.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Breckenridge and Auburn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Breckenridge | Auburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 16.8% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.8% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 38.6% | 38.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Breckenridge vs Auburn
- In Auburn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 14.7% in Breckenridge.
- Depression is more prevalent in Breckenridge at 22.6% compared to 22.0% in Auburn.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Breckenridge at 16.8% compared to 15.5% in Auburn.
- Binge drinking is more common in Breckenridge at 20.8% compared to 14.5% in Auburn.
- Auburn has higher obesity rates at 38.7% compared to 38.6% in Breckenridge.
- Disability percentages are higher in Breckenridge at 18.0% compared to 8.0% in Auburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Breckenridge | Auburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (37) | 0.3% (236) |
| High School Diploma | 19.8% (662) | 5.3% (4,206) |
| Less than High School | 11.7% (392) | 2.5% (1,964) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.4% (616) | 30.7% (24,546) |
Education Levels Comparison: Breckenridge vs Auburn
- A higher percentage of residents in Breckenridge have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.3% in Auburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Breckenridge hold a high school diploma at 19.8% compared to 5.3% in Auburn.
- More residents in Breckenridge have less than a high school education at 11.7% compared to 2.5% in Auburn.
- In Auburn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.7% compared to 18.4% in Breckenridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.