Demographics details for Braselton, GA vs Fort washington, MD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Braselton, GA vs Fort washington, MD.

Data Braselton Fort washington
Population 14,855 25,825
Median Age 36.5 years 44.1 years
Median Income $111,080 $143,623
Married Families 45.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 5% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Braselton vs Fort washington

  • The population in Fort washington is higher at 25,825, compared to 14,855 in Braselton.
  • The median age in Fort washington is higher at 44.1 years, compared to 36.5 years in Braselton.
  • Fort washington has a higher median income of $143,623, compared to $111,080 in Braselton.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Braselton at 45.0% compared to 43.0% in Fort washington.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Braselton and Fort washington at 5%.
  • Fort washington has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Braselton.

Demographics

Demographics Braselton vs Fort washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Braselton Fort washington
Black 5 61
White 78 8
Asian 2 8
Hispanic 8 17
Two or More Races 7 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Braselton vs Fort washington

  • In Fort washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 61% compared to 5% in Braselton.
  • Braselton has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 8% in Fort washington.
  • In Fort washington, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 2% in Braselton.
  • Fort washington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 8% in Braselton.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Braselton at 7% compared to 6% in Fort washington.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Braselton and Fort washington at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Braselton Fort washington
Mental Health Not Good 14.7% 12.5%
Physical Health Not Good 9.6% 7.9%
Depression 20.3% 11.6%
Smoking 13.2% 9.6%
Binge Drinking 17.2% 12.0%
Obesity 31.2% 37.7%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Braselton vs Fort washington

  • More residents in Braselton report poor mental health at 14.7% compared to 12.5% in Fort washington.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Braselton at 20.3% compared to 11.6% in Fort washington.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Braselton at 13.2% compared to 9.6% in Fort washington.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Braselton at 17.2% compared to 12.0% in Fort washington.
  • Fort washington has higher obesity rates at 37.7% compared to 31.2% in Braselton.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort washington at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Braselton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Braselton Fort washington
No Schooling 0.9% (135) 1.2% (297)
High School Diploma 10.5% (1,558) 14.4% (3,710)
Less than High School 6.8% (1,016) 8.3% (2,138)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 27.6% (4,103) 31.8% (8,208)

Education Levels Comparison: Braselton vs Fort washington

  • In Fort washington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.9% in Braselton.
  • In Fort washington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.4% compared to 10.5% in Braselton.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort washington at 8.3%, compared to 6.8% in Braselton.
  • In Fort washington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 27.6% in Braselton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.