Demographics details for Brainerd, MN vs Ash fork, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Brainerd, MN vs Ash fork, AZ.
| Data | Brainerd | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,580 | 466 |
| Median Age | 36.0 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $46,933 | $79,861 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Brainerd vs Ash fork
- In Brainerd, the population is higher at 14,580, compared to 466 in Ash fork.
- The median age in Ash fork is higher at 38.6 years, compared to 36.0 years in Brainerd.
- Ash fork has a higher median income of $79,861, compared to $46,933 in Brainerd.
- In Ash fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 29.0% in Brainerd.
- Brainerd has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Ash fork.
- The unemployment rate in Brainerd is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.1% in Ash fork.
Demographics
Demographics Brainerd vs Ash fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Brainerd | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 92 | 79 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 15 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Brainerd vs Ash fork
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Brainerd at 1% compared to 0% in Ash fork.
- Brainerd has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 79% in Ash fork.
- Both Brainerd and Ash fork have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Ash fork has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 3% in Brainerd.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ash fork at 15%, compared to 3% in Brainerd.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Brainerd at 1% compared to 0% in Ash fork.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Brainerd | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 21.4% |
| Smoking | 21.8% | 19.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 34.5% | 30.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Brainerd vs Ash fork
- In Ash fork, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 17.2% in Brainerd.
- Depression is more prevalent in Brainerd at 25.4% compared to 21.4% in Ash fork.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Brainerd at 21.8% compared to 19.3% in Ash fork.
- Binge drinking is more common in Brainerd at 17.9% compared to 15.9% in Ash fork.
- Obesity rates are higher in Brainerd at 34.5% compared to 30.6% in Ash fork.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ash fork at 26.0% compared to 17.0% in Brainerd.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Brainerd | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (36) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 18.6% (2,705) | 13.1% (61) |
| Less than High School | 10.8% (1,572) | 23.6% (110) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.5% (1,823) | 8.8% (41) |
Education Levels Comparison: Brainerd vs Ash fork
- A higher percentage of residents in Brainerd have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Ash fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Brainerd hold a high school diploma at 18.6% compared to 13.1% in Ash fork.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ash fork at 23.6%, compared to 10.8% in Brainerd.
- A higher percentage of residents in Brainerd hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.5% compared to 8.8% in Ash fork.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.