Demographics details for Bradenton, FL vs Wauconda, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bradenton, FL vs Wauconda, IL.
Data | Bradenton | Wauconda |
---|---|---|
Population | 56,961 | 13,932 |
Median Age | 45.4 years | 36.8 years |
Median Income | $55,795 | $108,229 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Bradenton vs Wauconda
- In Bradenton, the population is higher at 56,961, compared to 13,932 in Wauconda.
- Residents in Bradenton have a higher median age of 45.4 years compared to 36.8 years in Wauconda.
- Wauconda has a higher median income of $108,229, compared to $55,795 in Bradenton.
- In Wauconda, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 34.0% in Bradenton.
- Bradenton has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Wauconda.
- The unemployment rate in Bradenton is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.5% in Wauconda.
Demographics
Demographics Bradenton vs Wauconda provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bradenton | Wauconda |
---|---|---|
Black | 14 | 1 |
White | 54 | 66 |
Asian | 2 | 6 |
Hispanic | 22 | 18 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bradenton vs Wauconda
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bradenton at 14% compared to 1% in Wauconda.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Wauconda at 66% compared to 54% in Bradenton.
- In Wauconda, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 2% in Bradenton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bradenton at 22% compared to 18% in Wauconda.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Wauconda at 9%, compared to 8% in Bradenton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bradenton and Wauconda at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bradenton | Wauconda |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 14.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 9.2% |
Depression | 20.1% | 18.8% |
Smoking | 21.5% | 12.7% |
Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 18.8% |
Obesity | 33.2% | 31.0% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bradenton vs Wauconda
- More residents in Bradenton report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 14.2% in Wauconda.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bradenton at 20.1% compared to 18.8% in Wauconda.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bradenton at 21.5% compared to 12.7% in Wauconda.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Wauconda at 18.8% compared to 15.3% in Bradenton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bradenton at 33.2% compared to 31.0% in Wauconda.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bradenton at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Wauconda.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bradenton | Wauconda |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (506) | 1.4% (202) |
High School Diploma | 19.3% (10,990) | 10.5% (1,456) |
Less than High School | 15.2% (8,653) | 10.2% (1,425) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (10,990) | 26.0% (3,623) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bradenton vs Wauconda
- In Wauconda, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.9% in Bradenton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bradenton hold a high school diploma at 19.3% compared to 10.5% in Wauconda.
- More residents in Bradenton have less than a high school education at 15.2% compared to 10.2% in Wauconda.
- In Wauconda, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.0% compared to 19.3% in Bradenton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.