Demographics details for Bozeman, MT vs Sanford, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bozeman, MT vs Sanford, FL.
| Data | Bozeman | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 56,123 | 63,154 |
| Median Age | 28.2 years | 35.6 years |
| Median Income | $74,113 | $59,181 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.7 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Bozeman vs Sanford
- The population in Sanford is higher at 63,154, compared to 56,123 in Bozeman.
- The median age in Sanford is higher at 35.6 years, compared to 28.2 years in Bozeman.
- Bozeman has a higher median income of $74,113 compared to $59,181 in Sanford.
- In Sanford, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 30.0% in Bozeman.
- The poverty level is higher in Sanford at 12%, compared to 9% in Bozeman.
- Sanford has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 2.7% in Bozeman.
Demographics
Demographics Bozeman vs Sanford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bozeman | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 26 |
| White | 86 | 31 |
| Asian | 2 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 26 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 13 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bozeman vs Sanford
- In Sanford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 26% compared to 1% in Bozeman.
- Bozeman has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 31% in Sanford.
- In Sanford, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Bozeman.
- Sanford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 26%, compared to 5% in Bozeman.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sanford at 13%, compared to 5% in Bozeman.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bozeman at 1% compared to 0% in Sanford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bozeman | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 18.9% |
| Smoking | 12.6% | 19.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.1% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 24.8% | 34.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bozeman vs Sanford
- In Sanford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 14.5% in Bozeman.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bozeman at 22.8% compared to 18.9% in Sanford.
- Sanford has a higher smoking rate at 19.9% compared to 12.6% in Bozeman.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bozeman at 23.1% compared to 15.9% in Sanford.
- Sanford has higher obesity rates at 34.4% compared to 24.8% in Bozeman.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sanford at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Bozeman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bozeman | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (11) | 0.6% (389) |
| High School Diploma | 5.7% (3,187) | 19.0% (11,984) |
| Less than High School | 2.3% (1,316) | 11.1% (7,010) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.7% (20,038) | 16.9% (10,683) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bozeman vs Sanford
- In Sanford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Bozeman.
- In Sanford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.0% compared to 5.7% in Bozeman.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sanford at 11.1%, compared to 2.3% in Bozeman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bozeman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.7% compared to 16.9% in Sanford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.