Demographics details for Bozeman, MT vs Philadelphia, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bozeman, MT vs Philadelphia, PA.
| Data | Bozeman | Philadelphia |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 56,123 | 1,567,258 |
| Median Age | 28.2 years | 34.8 years |
| Median Income | $74,113 | $57,537 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 25% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.7 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Bozeman vs Philadelphia
- The population in Philadelphia is higher at 1,567,258, compared to 56,123 in Bozeman.
- The median age in Philadelphia is higher at 34.8 years, compared to 28.2 years in Bozeman.
- Bozeman has a higher median income of $74,113 compared to $57,537 in Philadelphia.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bozeman at 30.0% compared to 26.0% in Philadelphia.
- The poverty level is higher in Philadelphia at 25%, compared to 9% in Bozeman.
- Philadelphia has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 2.7% in Bozeman.
Demographics
Demographics Bozeman vs Philadelphia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bozeman | Philadelphia |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 41 |
| White | 86 | 29 |
| Asian | 2 | 8 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bozeman vs Philadelphia
- In Philadelphia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 41% compared to 1% in Bozeman.
- Bozeman has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 29% in Philadelphia.
- In Philadelphia, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 2% in Bozeman.
- Philadelphia has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 5% in Bozeman.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Philadelphia at 6%, compared to 5% in Bozeman.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bozeman at 1% compared to 0% in Philadelphia.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bozeman | Philadelphia |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 12.8% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 12.6% | 18.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.1% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 24.8% | 31.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bozeman vs Philadelphia
- In Philadelphia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 14.5% in Bozeman.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bozeman at 22.8% compared to 21.0% in Philadelphia.
- Philadelphia has a higher smoking rate at 18.9% compared to 12.6% in Bozeman.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bozeman at 23.1% compared to 16.9% in Philadelphia.
- Philadelphia has higher obesity rates at 31.3% compared to 24.8% in Bozeman.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Philadelphia at 17.0% compared to 8.0% in Bozeman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bozeman | Philadelphia |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (11) | 1.5% (23,668) |
| High School Diploma | 5.7% (3,187) | 18.3% (287,402) |
| Less than High School | 2.3% (1,316) | 13.3% (207,719) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.7% (20,038) | 23.4% (366,310) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bozeman vs Philadelphia
- In Philadelphia, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Bozeman.
- In Philadelphia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.3% compared to 5.7% in Bozeman.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Philadelphia at 13.3%, compared to 2.3% in Bozeman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bozeman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.7% compared to 23.4% in Philadelphia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.