Demographics details for Bozeman, MT vs Penn valley, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bozeman, MT vs Penn valley, CA.
| Data | Bozeman | Penn valley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 56,123 | 1,188 |
| Median Age | 28.2 years | 55.7 years |
| Median Income | $74,113 | $65,882 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.7 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Bozeman vs Penn valley
- In Bozeman, the population is higher at 56,123, compared to 1,188 in Penn valley.
- The median age in Penn valley is higher at 55.7 years, compared to 28.2 years in Bozeman.
- Bozeman has a higher median income of $74,113 compared to $65,882 in Penn valley.
- In Penn valley, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 30.0% in Bozeman.
- Bozeman has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 8% in Penn valley.
- Penn valley has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 2.7% in Bozeman.
Demographics
Demographics Bozeman vs Penn valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bozeman | Penn valley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 86 | 86 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bozeman vs Penn valley
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bozeman at 1% compared to 0% in Penn valley.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Bozeman and Penn valley at 86%.
- The Asian population is larger in Bozeman at 2% compared to 0% in Penn valley.
- Penn valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 5% in Bozeman.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Penn valley at 7%, compared to 5% in Bozeman.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bozeman at 1% compared to 0% in Penn valley.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bozeman | Penn valley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 11.8% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 22.9% |
| Smoking | 12.6% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.1% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 24.8% | 29.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 30.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bozeman vs Penn valley
- In Penn valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 14.5% in Bozeman.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Penn valley at 22.9% versus 22.8% in Bozeman.
- Penn valley has a higher smoking rate at 14.8% compared to 12.6% in Bozeman.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bozeman at 23.1% compared to 17.9% in Penn valley.
- Penn valley has higher obesity rates at 29.5% compared to 24.8% in Bozeman.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Penn valley at 30.0% compared to 8.0% in Bozeman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bozeman | Penn valley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (11) | 4.9% (58) |
| High School Diploma | 5.7% (3,187) | 21.6% (257) |
| Less than High School | 2.3% (1,316) | 8.2% (98) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.7% (20,038) | 12.3% (146) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bozeman vs Penn valley
- In Penn valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.9% compared to 0.0% in Bozeman.
- In Penn valley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.6% compared to 5.7% in Bozeman.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Penn valley at 8.2%, compared to 2.3% in Bozeman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bozeman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.7% compared to 12.3% in Penn valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.