Demographics details for Bozeman, MT vs Harker heights, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bozeman, MT vs Harker heights, TX.
| Data | Bozeman | Harker heights |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 56,123 | 34,102 |
| Median Age | 28.2 years | 34.5 years |
| Median Income | $74,113 | $72,258 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.7 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Bozeman vs Harker heights
- In Bozeman, the population is higher at 56,123, compared to 34,102 in Harker heights.
- The median age in Harker heights is higher at 34.5 years, compared to 28.2 years in Bozeman.
- Bozeman has a higher median income of $74,113 compared to $72,258 in Harker heights.
- In Harker heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 30.0% in Bozeman.
- The poverty level is identical in both Bozeman and Harker heights at 9%.
- Harker heights has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 2.7% in Bozeman.
Demographics
Demographics Bozeman vs Harker heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bozeman | Harker heights |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 28 |
| White | 86 | 36 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 21 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Bozeman vs Harker heights
- In Harker heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 1% in Bozeman.
- Bozeman has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 36% in Harker heights.
- In Harker heights, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Bozeman.
- Harker heights has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 5% in Bozeman.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Harker heights at 11%, compared to 5% in Bozeman.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bozeman and Harker heights at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bozeman | Harker heights |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 22.5% |
| Smoking | 12.6% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.1% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 24.8% | 37.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bozeman vs Harker heights
- In Harker heights, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 14.5% in Bozeman.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bozeman at 22.8% compared to 22.5% in Harker heights.
- Harker heights has a higher smoking rate at 15.5% compared to 12.6% in Bozeman.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bozeman at 23.1% compared to 17.1% in Harker heights.
- Harker heights has higher obesity rates at 37.1% compared to 24.8% in Bozeman.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Harker heights at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Bozeman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bozeman | Harker heights |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (11) | 1.3% (448) |
| High School Diploma | 5.7% (3,187) | 11.6% (3,958) |
| Less than High School | 2.3% (1,316) | 10.3% (3,509) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.7% (20,038) | 18.8% (6,403) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bozeman vs Harker heights
- In Harker heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Bozeman.
- In Harker heights, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.6% compared to 5.7% in Bozeman.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Harker heights at 10.3%, compared to 2.3% in Bozeman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bozeman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.7% compared to 18.8% in Harker heights.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.