Demographics details for Bozeman, MT vs Erwin, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bozeman, MT vs Erwin, TN.
| Data | Bozeman | Erwin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 56,123 | 5,953 |
| Median Age | 28.2 years | 46.8 years |
| Median Income | $74,113 | $40,670 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.7 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Bozeman vs Erwin
- In Bozeman, the population is higher at 56,123, compared to 5,953 in Erwin.
- The median age in Erwin is higher at 46.8 years, compared to 28.2 years in Bozeman.
- Bozeman has a higher median income of $74,113 compared to $40,670 in Erwin.
- In Erwin, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 30.0% in Bozeman.
- The poverty level is higher in Erwin at 12%, compared to 9% in Bozeman.
- Erwin has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.7% in Bozeman.
Demographics
Demographics Bozeman vs Erwin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bozeman | Erwin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 86 | 87 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bozeman vs Erwin
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bozeman at 1% compared to 0% in Erwin.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Erwin at 87% compared to 86% in Bozeman.
- The Asian population is larger in Bozeman at 2% compared to 0% in Erwin.
- Erwin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 5% in Bozeman.
- Both Bozeman and Erwin have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bozeman at 1% compared to 0% in Erwin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bozeman | Erwin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 14.1% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 29.7% |
| Smoking | 12.6% | 23.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.1% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 24.8% | 38.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bozeman vs Erwin
- In Erwin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 14.5% in Bozeman.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Erwin at 29.7% versus 22.8% in Bozeman.
- Erwin has a higher smoking rate at 23.6% compared to 12.6% in Bozeman.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bozeman at 23.1% compared to 15.9% in Erwin.
- Erwin has higher obesity rates at 38.0% compared to 24.8% in Bozeman.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Erwin at 21.0% compared to 8.0% in Bozeman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bozeman | Erwin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (11) | 0.3% (15) |
| High School Diploma | 5.7% (3,187) | 20.2% (1,201) |
| Less than High School | 2.3% (1,316) | 19.7% (1,170) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.7% (20,038) | 11.7% (698) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bozeman vs Erwin
- In Erwin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Bozeman.
- In Erwin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.2% compared to 5.7% in Bozeman.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Erwin at 19.7%, compared to 2.3% in Bozeman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bozeman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.7% compared to 11.7% in Erwin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.