Demographics details for Bozeman, MT vs Darwin, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bozeman, MT vs Darwin, MN.
| Data | Bozeman | Darwin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 56,123 | 344 |
| Median Age | 28.2 years | 34.8 years |
| Median Income | $74,113 | $62,083 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.7 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Bozeman vs Darwin
- In Bozeman, the population is higher at 56,123, compared to 344 in Darwin.
- The median age in Darwin is higher at 34.8 years, compared to 28.2 years in Bozeman.
- Bozeman has a higher median income of $74,113 compared to $62,083 in Darwin.
- In Darwin, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 30.0% in Bozeman.
- Bozeman has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Darwin.
- Darwin has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.7% in Bozeman.
Demographics
Demographics Bozeman vs Darwin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bozeman | Darwin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 86 | 90 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 1 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bozeman vs Darwin
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bozeman at 1% compared to 0% in Darwin.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Darwin at 90% compared to 86% in Bozeman.
- The Asian population is larger in Bozeman at 2% compared to 0% in Darwin.
- Darwin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 5% in Bozeman.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bozeman at 5% compared to 1% in Darwin.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bozeman at 1% compared to 0% in Darwin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bozeman | Darwin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 14.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 8.8% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 23.2% |
| Smoking | 12.6% | 17.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.1% | 22.3% |
| Obesity | 24.8% | 32.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bozeman vs Darwin
- In Darwin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.7% compared to 14.5% in Bozeman.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Darwin at 23.2% versus 22.8% in Bozeman.
- Darwin has a higher smoking rate at 17.5% compared to 12.6% in Bozeman.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bozeman at 23.1% compared to 22.3% in Darwin.
- Darwin has higher obesity rates at 32.7% compared to 24.8% in Bozeman.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Darwin at 19.0% compared to 8.0% in Bozeman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bozeman | Darwin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (11) | 1.7% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 5.7% (3,187) | 20.9% (72) |
| Less than High School | 2.3% (1,316) | 9.3% (32) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.7% (20,038) | 11.9% (41) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bozeman vs Darwin
- In Darwin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Bozeman.
- In Darwin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.9% compared to 5.7% in Bozeman.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Darwin at 9.3%, compared to 2.3% in Bozeman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bozeman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.7% compared to 11.9% in Darwin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.