Demographics details for Boyle, MS vs Alum creek, WV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Boyle, MS vs Alum creek, WV.
| Data | Boyle | Alum creek |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 499 | 1,420 |
| Median Age | 36.7 years | 47.4 years |
| Median Income | $33,750 | $65,179 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 54.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Boyle vs Alum creek
- The population in Alum creek is higher at 1,420, compared to 499 in Boyle.
- The median age in Alum creek is higher at 47.4 years, compared to 36.7 years in Boyle.
- Alum creek has a higher median income of $65,179, compared to $33,750 in Boyle.
- In Alum creek, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 25.0% in Boyle.
- Boyle has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 10% in Alum creek.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Boyle and Alum creek at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Boyle vs Alum creek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Boyle | Alum creek |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 50 | Data is updating |
| White | 50 | 100 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Boyle vs Alum creek
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Boyle at 50% compared to 0% in Alum creek.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Alum creek at 100% compared to 50% in Boyle.
- Both Boyle and Alum creek have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Boyle and Alum creek at 0%.
- Both Boyle and Alum creek have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 0%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Boyle and Alum creek at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Boyle | Alum creek |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 20.4% | 29.5% |
| Smoking | 20.5% | 20.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.0% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 41.3% | 40.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 48.0% | 30.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Boyle vs Alum creek
- In Alum creek, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 17.4% in Boyle.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Alum creek at 29.5% versus 20.4% in Boyle.
- Alum creek has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 20.5% in Boyle.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Alum creek at 15.1% compared to 13.0% in Boyle.
- Obesity rates are higher in Boyle at 41.3% compared to 40.1% in Alum creek.
- Disability percentages are higher in Boyle at 48.0% compared to 30.0% in Alum creek.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Boyle | Alum creek |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 16.2% (81) | 34.9% (496) |
| Less than High School | 17.0% (85) | 8.9% (126) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 41.7% (208) | 9.7% (138) |
Education Levels Comparison: Boyle vs Alum creek
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Boyle and Alum creek at 0.0%.
- In Alum creek, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 34.9% compared to 16.2% in Boyle.
- More residents in Boyle have less than a high school education at 17.0% compared to 8.9% in Alum creek.
- A higher percentage of residents in Boyle hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.7% compared to 9.7% in Alum creek.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.