Demographics details for Bowman, SC vs Red wing, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bowman, SC vs Red wing, MN.
| Data | Bowman | Red wing |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 769 | 16,672 |
| Median Age | 47.2 years | 42.4 years |
| Median Income | $33,250 | $65,107 |
| Married Families | 21.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Bowman vs Red wing
- The population in Red wing is higher at 16,672, compared to 769 in Bowman.
- Residents in Bowman have a higher median age of 47.2 years compared to 42.4 years in Red wing.
- Red wing has a higher median income of $65,107, compared to $33,250 in Bowman.
- In Red wing, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 21.0% in Bowman.
- Bowman has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 8% in Red wing.
- The unemployment rate in Bowman is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.7% in Red wing.
Demographics
Demographics Bowman vs Red wing provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bowman | Red wing |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 66 | 3 |
| White | 33 | 86 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Bowman vs Red wing
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bowman at 66% compared to 3% in Red wing.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Red wing at 86% compared to 33% in Bowman.
- In Red wing, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Bowman.
- Red wing has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 0% in Bowman.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Red wing at 3%, compared to 1% in Bowman.
- In Red wing, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Bowman.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bowman | Red wing |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 19.3% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 21.8% | 17.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.3% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 43.7% | 38.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bowman vs Red wing
- More residents in Bowman report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 14.9% in Red wing.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Red wing at 23.4% versus 19.3% in Bowman.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bowman at 21.8% compared to 17.8% in Red wing.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Red wing at 19.1% compared to 14.3% in Bowman.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bowman at 43.7% compared to 38.6% in Red wing.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bowman at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Red wing.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bowman | Red wing |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.6% (98) |
| High School Diploma | 26.4% (203) | 20.6% (3,441) |
| Less than High School | 12.6% (97) | 9.7% (1,617) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (56) | 19.4% (3,232) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bowman vs Red wing
- In Red wing, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Bowman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bowman hold a high school diploma at 26.4% compared to 20.6% in Red wing.
- More residents in Bowman have less than a high school education at 12.6% compared to 9.7% in Red wing.
- In Red wing, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 7.3% in Bowman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.