Demographics details for Bowman, SC vs Greeley, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bowman, SC vs Greeley, CO.
| Data | Bowman | Greeley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 769 | 109,209 |
| Median Age | 47.2 years | 31.9 years |
| Median Income | $33,250 | $65,525 |
| Married Families | 21.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Bowman vs Greeley
- The population in Greeley is higher at 109,209, compared to 769 in Bowman.
- Residents in Bowman have a higher median age of 47.2 years compared to 31.9 years in Greeley.
- Greeley has a higher median income of $65,525, compared to $33,250 in Bowman.
- In Greeley, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 21.0% in Bowman.
- Bowman has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Greeley.
- The unemployment rate in Bowman is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.8% in Greeley.
Demographics
Demographics Bowman vs Greeley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bowman | Greeley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 66 | 3 |
| White | 33 | 45 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 39 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Bowman vs Greeley
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bowman at 66% compared to 3% in Greeley.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Greeley at 45% compared to 33% in Bowman.
- In Greeley, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Bowman.
- Greeley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 39%, compared to 0% in Bowman.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Greeley at 11%, compared to 1% in Bowman.
- In Greeley, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Bowman.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bowman | Greeley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 19.3% | 21.4% |
| Smoking | 21.8% | 16.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.3% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 43.7% | 30.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bowman vs Greeley
- More residents in Bowman report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 17.0% in Greeley.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Greeley at 21.4% versus 19.3% in Bowman.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bowman at 21.8% compared to 16.5% in Greeley.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Greeley at 16.7% compared to 14.3% in Bowman.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bowman at 43.7% compared to 30.8% in Greeley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bowman at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Greeley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bowman | Greeley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.2% (2,416) |
| High School Diploma | 26.4% (203) | 12.0% (13,106) |
| Less than High School | 12.6% (97) | 19.3% (21,128) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (56) | 16.4% (17,877) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bowman vs Greeley
- In Greeley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.0% in Bowman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bowman hold a high school diploma at 26.4% compared to 12.0% in Greeley.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Greeley at 19.3%, compared to 12.6% in Bowman.
- In Greeley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 7.3% in Bowman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.