Demographics details for Bowman, SC vs Canton, MA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Bowman, SC vs Canton, MA.

Data Bowman Canton
Population 769 23,629
Median Age 47.2 years 39.0 years
Median Income $33,250 $120,000
Married Families 21.0% 69.6%
Poverty Level 15% 4%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 3.9

Population Comparison: Bowman vs Canton

  • The population in Canton is higher at 23,629, compared to 769 in Bowman.
  • Residents in Bowman have a higher median age of 47.2 years compared to 39.0 years in Canton.
  • Canton has a higher median income of $120,000, compared to $33,250 in Bowman.
  • In Canton, the percentage of married families is higher at 69.6%, compared to 21.0% in Bowman.
  • Bowman has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 4% in Canton.
  • The unemployment rate in Bowman is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.9% in Canton.

Demographics

Demographics Bowman vs Canton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Bowman Canton
Black 66 1.2
White 33 85.3
Asian Data is updating 11.5
Hispanic Data is updating 2.0
Two or More Races 1 4.5
American Indian Data is updating 0.2

Demographics Comparison: Bowman vs Canton

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bowman at 66% compared to 1.2% in Canton.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Canton at 85.3% compared to 33% in Bowman.
  • In Canton, the Asian population stands at 11.5%, greater than 0% in Bowman.
  • Canton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2.0%, compared to 0% in Bowman.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Canton at 4.5%, compared to 1% in Bowman.
  • In Canton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 0.2%, compared to 0% in Bowman.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Bowman Canton
Mental Health Not Good 18.7% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 13.9% Data is updating%
Depression 19.3% Data is updating%
Smoking 21.8% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 14.3% Data is updating%
Obesity 43.7% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 17.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Bowman vs Canton

  • More residents in Bowman report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 0.0% in Canton.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Bowman at 19.3% compared to 0.0% in Canton.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Bowman at 21.8% compared to 0.0% in Canton.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Bowman at 14.3% compared to 0.0% in Canton.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Bowman at 43.7% compared to 0.0% in Canton.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Bowman at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Canton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Bowman Canton
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 26.4% (203) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 12.6% (97) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.3% (56) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Bowman vs Canton

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Bowman and Canton at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Bowman hold a high school diploma at 26.4% compared to 0.0% in Canton.
  • More residents in Bowman have less than a high school education at 12.6% compared to 0.0% in Canton.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Bowman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.3% compared to 0.0% in Canton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.