Demographics details for Bowman, SC vs Canton, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bowman, SC vs Canton, MA.
| Data | Bowman | Canton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 769 | 23,629 |
| Median Age | 47.2 years | 39.0 years |
| Median Income | $33,250 | $120,000 |
| Married Families | 21.0% | 69.6% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Bowman vs Canton
- The population in Canton is higher at 23,629, compared to 769 in Bowman.
- Residents in Bowman have a higher median age of 47.2 years compared to 39.0 years in Canton.
- Canton has a higher median income of $120,000, compared to $33,250 in Bowman.
- In Canton, the percentage of married families is higher at 69.6%, compared to 21.0% in Bowman.
- Bowman has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 4% in Canton.
- The unemployment rate in Bowman is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.9% in Canton.
Demographics
Demographics Bowman vs Canton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bowman | Canton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 66 | 1.2 |
| White | 33 | 85.3 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 11.5 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 2.0 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 4.5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 0.2 |
Demographics Comparison: Bowman vs Canton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bowman at 66% compared to 1.2% in Canton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Canton at 85.3% compared to 33% in Bowman.
- In Canton, the Asian population stands at 11.5%, greater than 0% in Bowman.
- Canton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2.0%, compared to 0% in Bowman.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Canton at 4.5%, compared to 1% in Bowman.
- In Canton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 0.2%, compared to 0% in Bowman.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bowman | Canton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 19.3% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 21.8% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.3% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 43.7% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bowman vs Canton
- More residents in Bowman report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 0.0% in Canton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bowman at 19.3% compared to 0.0% in Canton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bowman at 21.8% compared to 0.0% in Canton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bowman at 14.3% compared to 0.0% in Canton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bowman at 43.7% compared to 0.0% in Canton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bowman at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Canton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bowman | Canton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 26.4% (203) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 12.6% (97) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (56) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bowman vs Canton
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Bowman and Canton at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bowman hold a high school diploma at 26.4% compared to 0.0% in Canton.
- More residents in Bowman have less than a high school education at 12.6% compared to 0.0% in Canton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bowman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.3% compared to 0.0% in Canton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.