Demographics details for Bowie, TX vs Port clinton, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bowie, TX vs Port clinton, OH.
| Data | Bowie | Port clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,738 | 5,966 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 44.9 years |
| Median Income | $60,659 | $55,534 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Bowie vs Port clinton
- The population in Port clinton is higher at 5,966, compared to 5,738 in Bowie.
- The median age in Port clinton is higher at 44.9 years, compared to 36.4 years in Bowie.
- Bowie has a higher median income of $60,659 compared to $55,534 in Port clinton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bowie at 38.0% compared to 35.0% in Port clinton.
- The poverty level is higher in Port clinton at 12%, compared to 10% in Bowie.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Bowie and Port clinton at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Bowie vs Port clinton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bowie | Port clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 3 |
| White | 86 | 82 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bowie vs Port clinton
- In Port clinton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Bowie.
- Bowie has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 82% in Port clinton.
- Both Bowie and Port clinton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Bowie and Port clinton at 7%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Port clinton at 8%, compared to 5% in Bowie.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bowie at 1% compared to 0% in Port clinton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bowie | Port clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 26.3% | 25.1% |
| Smoking | 19.7% | 24.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 36.9% | 40.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bowie vs Port clinton
- In Port clinton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 19.0% in Bowie.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bowie at 26.3% compared to 25.1% in Port clinton.
- Port clinton has a higher smoking rate at 24.0% compared to 19.7% in Bowie.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bowie at 18.5% compared to 17.9% in Port clinton.
- Port clinton has higher obesity rates at 40.7% compared to 36.9% in Bowie.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Port clinton at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Bowie.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bowie | Port clinton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (86) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 28.0% (1,609) | 21.7% (1,296) |
| Less than High School | 14.2% (812) | 17.1% (1,023) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (536) | 13.8% (825) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bowie vs Port clinton
- A higher percentage of residents in Bowie have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Port clinton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bowie hold a high school diploma at 28.0% compared to 21.7% in Port clinton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Port clinton at 17.1%, compared to 14.2% in Bowie.
- In Port clinton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.8% compared to 9.3% in Bowie.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.