Demographics details for Bowie, TX vs Fountain run, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bowie, TX vs Fountain run, KY.
| Data | Bowie | Fountain run |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,738 | 221 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 49.1 years |
| Median Income | $60,659 | $38,750 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 62.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Bowie vs Fountain run
- In Bowie, the population is higher at 5,738, compared to 221 in Fountain run.
- The median age in Fountain run is higher at 49.1 years, compared to 36.4 years in Bowie.
- Bowie has a higher median income of $60,659 compared to $38,750 in Fountain run.
- In Fountain run, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.0%, compared to 38.0% in Bowie.
- The poverty level is higher in Fountain run at 12%, compared to 10% in Bowie.
- The unemployment rate in Bowie is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Fountain run.
Demographics
Demographics Bowie vs Fountain run provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bowie | Fountain run |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 86 | 99 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bowie vs Fountain run
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Bowie and Fountain run at 1%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fountain run at 99% compared to 86% in Bowie.
- Both Bowie and Fountain run have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bowie at 7% compared to 0% in Fountain run.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bowie at 5% compared to 0% in Fountain run.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bowie at 1% compared to 0% in Fountain run.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bowie | Fountain run |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 22.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 17.4% |
| Depression | 26.3% | 30.6% |
| Smoking | 19.7% | 29.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 36.9% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bowie vs Fountain run
- In Fountain run, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.1% compared to 19.0% in Bowie.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fountain run at 30.6% versus 26.3% in Bowie.
- Fountain run has a higher smoking rate at 29.1% compared to 19.7% in Bowie.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bowie at 18.5% compared to 14.2% in Fountain run.
- Fountain run has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 36.9% in Bowie.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fountain run at 24.0% compared to 13.0% in Bowie.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bowie | Fountain run |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (86) | 1.8% (4) |
| High School Diploma | 28.0% (1,609) | 42.1% (93) |
| Less than High School | 14.2% (812) | 48.9% (108) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (536) | 10.9% (24) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bowie vs Fountain run
- In Fountain run, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.5% in Bowie.
- In Fountain run, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 42.1% compared to 28.0% in Bowie.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fountain run at 48.9%, compared to 14.2% in Bowie.
- In Fountain run, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.9% compared to 9.3% in Bowie.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.