Demographics details for Bowie, TX vs Fort calhoun, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bowie, TX vs Fort calhoun, NE.
| Data | Bowie | Fort calhoun |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,738 | 1,115 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 44.1 years |
| Median Income | $60,659 | $75,900 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Bowie vs Fort calhoun
- In Bowie, the population is higher at 5,738, compared to 1,115 in Fort calhoun.
- The median age in Fort calhoun is higher at 44.1 years, compared to 36.4 years in Bowie.
- Fort calhoun has a higher median income of $75,900, compared to $60,659 in Bowie.
- In Fort calhoun, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 38.0% in Bowie.
- Bowie has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Fort calhoun.
- The unemployment rate in Bowie is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.5% in Fort calhoun.
Demographics
Demographics Bowie vs Fort calhoun provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bowie | Fort calhoun |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 86 | 85 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bowie vs Fort calhoun
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Bowie and Fort calhoun at 1%.
- Bowie has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 85% in Fort calhoun.
- Both Bowie and Fort calhoun have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bowie at 7% compared to 6% in Fort calhoun.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort calhoun at 8%, compared to 5% in Bowie.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bowie at 1% compared to 0% in Fort calhoun.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bowie | Fort calhoun |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 12.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 7.7% |
| Depression | 26.3% | 15.3% |
| Smoking | 19.7% | 14.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 22.1% |
| Obesity | 36.9% | 33.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bowie vs Fort calhoun
- More residents in Bowie report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 12.3% in Fort calhoun.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bowie at 26.3% compared to 15.3% in Fort calhoun.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bowie at 19.7% compared to 14.0% in Fort calhoun.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort calhoun at 22.1% compared to 18.5% in Bowie.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bowie at 36.9% compared to 33.3% in Fort calhoun.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bowie at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort calhoun.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bowie | Fort calhoun |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (86) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 28.0% (1,609) | 33.7% (376) |
| Less than High School | 14.2% (812) | 6.5% (72) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (536) | 14.4% (161) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bowie vs Fort calhoun
- A higher percentage of residents in Bowie have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Fort calhoun.
- In Fort calhoun, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 33.7% compared to 28.0% in Bowie.
- More residents in Bowie have less than a high school education at 14.2% compared to 6.5% in Fort calhoun.
- In Fort calhoun, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 9.3% in Bowie.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.