Demographics details for Bowie, TX vs Alpharetta, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bowie, TX vs Alpharetta, GA.
| Data | Bowie | Alpharetta |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,738 | 67,267 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 40.6 years |
| Median Income | $60,659 | $141,402 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Bowie vs Alpharetta
- The population in Alpharetta is higher at 67,267, compared to 5,738 in Bowie.
- The median age in Alpharetta is higher at 40.6 years, compared to 36.4 years in Bowie.
- Alpharetta has a higher median income of $141,402, compared to $60,659 in Bowie.
- In Alpharetta, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 38.0% in Bowie.
- Bowie has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Alpharetta.
- The unemployment rate in Bowie is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Alpharetta.
Demographics
Demographics Bowie vs Alpharetta provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bowie | Alpharetta |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 11 |
| White | 86 | 55 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 22 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bowie vs Alpharetta
- In Alpharetta, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 1% in Bowie.
- Bowie has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 55% in Alpharetta.
- In Alpharetta, the Asian population stands at 22%, greater than 0% in Bowie.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Bowie and Alpharetta at 7%.
- Both Bowie and Alpharetta have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bowie at 1% compared to 0% in Alpharetta.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bowie | Alpharetta |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 12.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 7.6% |
| Depression | 26.3% | 17.3% |
| Smoking | 19.7% | 9.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 36.9% | 23.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bowie vs Alpharetta
- More residents in Bowie report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 12.1% in Alpharetta.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bowie at 26.3% compared to 17.3% in Alpharetta.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bowie at 19.7% compared to 9.4% in Alpharetta.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bowie at 18.5% compared to 17.7% in Alpharetta.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bowie at 36.9% compared to 23.0% in Alpharetta.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bowie at 13.0% compared to 6.0% in Alpharetta.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bowie | Alpharetta |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (86) | 0.9% (602) |
| High School Diploma | 28.0% (1,609) | 4.7% (3,172) |
| Less than High School | 14.2% (812) | 3.9% (2,597) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (536) | 47.9% (32,211) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bowie vs Alpharetta
- A higher percentage of residents in Bowie have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.9% in Alpharetta.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bowie hold a high school diploma at 28.0% compared to 4.7% in Alpharetta.
- More residents in Bowie have less than a high school education at 14.2% compared to 3.9% in Alpharetta.
- In Alpharetta, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.9% compared to 9.3% in Bowie.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.