Demographics details for Bowie, MD vs Fowler, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bowie, MD vs Fowler, KS.
| Data | Bowie | Fowler |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 57,192 | 513 |
| Median Age | 43.2 years | 39.8 years |
| Median Income | $138,797 | $45,402 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.8 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Bowie vs Fowler
- In Bowie, the population is higher at 57,192, compared to 513 in Fowler.
- Residents in Bowie have a higher median age of 43.2 years compared to 39.8 years in Fowler.
- Bowie has a higher median income of $138,797 compared to $45,402 in Fowler.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bowie at 41.0% compared to 24.0% in Fowler.
- The poverty level is higher in Fowler at 13%, compared to 5% in Bowie.
- Fowler has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.8% in Bowie.
Demographics
Demographics Bowie vs Fowler provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bowie | Fowler |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 58 | Data is updating |
| White | 24 | 71 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Bowie vs Fowler
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bowie at 58% compared to 0% in Fowler.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fowler at 71% compared to 24% in Bowie.
- The Asian population is larger in Bowie at 3% compared to 0% in Fowler.
- Fowler has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 8% in Bowie.
- Both Bowie and Fowler have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 7%.
- In Fowler, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Bowie.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bowie | Fowler |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.4% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.4% | 11.3% |
| Depression | 13.3% | 21.2% |
| Smoking | 8.7% | 19.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 18.8% |
| Obesity | 35.1% | 39.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bowie vs Fowler
- In Fowler, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 12.4% in Bowie.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fowler at 21.2% versus 13.3% in Bowie.
- Fowler has a higher smoking rate at 19.7% compared to 8.7% in Bowie.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fowler at 18.8% compared to 13.6% in Bowie.
- Fowler has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 35.1% in Bowie.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fowler at 17.0% compared to 9.0% in Bowie.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bowie | Fowler |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (531) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 12.2% (6,950) | 9.0% (46) |
| Less than High School | 5.9% (3,399) | 13.5% (69) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.9% (20,525) | 20.9% (107) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bowie vs Fowler
- A higher percentage of residents in Bowie have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Fowler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bowie hold a high school diploma at 12.2% compared to 9.0% in Fowler.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fowler at 13.5%, compared to 5.9% in Bowie.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bowie hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.9% compared to 20.9% in Fowler.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.