Demographics details for Bowie, MD vs Canoga park, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bowie, MD vs Canoga park, CA.
| Data | Bowie | Canoga park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 57,192 | 58,116 |
| Median Age | 43.2 years | 39.0 years |
| Median Income | $138,797 | $78,500 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 18900.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.8 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Bowie vs Canoga park
- The population in Canoga park is higher at 58,116, compared to 57,192 in Bowie.
- Residents in Bowie have a higher median age of 43.2 years compared to 39.0 years in Canoga park.
- Bowie has a higher median income of $138,797 compared to $78,500 in Canoga park.
- In Canoga park, the percentage of married families is higher at 18900.0%, compared to 41.0% in Bowie.
- The poverty level is higher in Canoga park at 12%, compared to 5% in Bowie.
- Canoga park has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.8% in Bowie.
Demographics
Demographics Bowie vs Canoga park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bowie | Canoga park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 58 | 3 |
| White | 24 | 52 |
| Asian | 3 | 10 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bowie vs Canoga park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bowie at 58% compared to 3% in Canoga park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Canoga park at 52% compared to 24% in Bowie.
- In Canoga park, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 3% in Bowie.
- Canoga park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 8% in Bowie.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bowie at 7% compared to 5% in Canoga park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bowie and Canoga park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bowie | Canoga park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.4% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.4% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 13.3% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 8.7% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 35.1% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bowie vs Canoga park
- More residents in Bowie report poor mental health at 12.4% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bowie at 13.3% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bowie at 8.7% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bowie at 13.6% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bowie at 35.1% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bowie at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bowie | Canoga park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (531) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 12.2% (6,950) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 5.9% (3,399) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.9% (20,525) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bowie vs Canoga park
- A higher percentage of residents in Bowie have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bowie hold a high school diploma at 12.2% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
- More residents in Bowie have less than a high school education at 5.9% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bowie hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.9% compared to 0.0% in Canoga park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.