Demographics details for Bowie, MD vs Attica, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bowie, MD vs Attica, KS.
Data | Bowie | Attica |
---|---|---|
Population | 57,192 | 500 |
Median Age | 43.2 years | 41.2 years |
Median Income | $138,797 | $42,422 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.8 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Bowie vs Attica
- In Bowie, the population is higher at 57,192, compared to 500 in Attica.
- Residents in Bowie have a higher median age of 43.2 years compared to 41.2 years in Attica.
- Bowie has a higher median income of $138,797 compared to $42,422 in Attica.
- In Attica, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 41.0% in Bowie.
- The poverty level is higher in Attica at 12%, compared to 5% in Bowie.
- Attica has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.8% in Bowie.
Demographics
Demographics Bowie vs Attica provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bowie | Attica |
---|---|---|
Black | 58 | Data is updating |
White | 24 | 64 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 8 | 26 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Bowie vs Attica
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bowie at 58% compared to 0% in Attica.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Attica at 64% compared to 24% in Bowie.
- The Asian population is larger in Bowie at 3% compared to 0% in Attica.
- Attica has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 26%, compared to 8% in Bowie.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Attica at 9%, compared to 7% in Bowie.
- In Attica, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Bowie.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bowie | Attica |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.4% | 17.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.4% | 11.7% |
Depression | 13.3% | 22.6% |
Smoking | 8.7% | 21.5% |
Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 19.5% |
Obesity | 35.1% | 40.8% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bowie vs Attica
- In Attica, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 12.4% in Bowie.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Attica at 22.6% versus 13.3% in Bowie.
- Attica has a higher smoking rate at 21.5% compared to 8.7% in Bowie.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Attica at 19.5% compared to 13.6% in Bowie.
- Attica has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 35.1% in Bowie.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Attica at 24.0% compared to 9.0% in Bowie.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bowie | Attica |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (531) | 2.6% (13) |
High School Diploma | 12.2% (6,950) | 25.8% (129) |
Less than High School | 5.9% (3,399) | 21.2% (106) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.9% (20,525) | 13.6% (68) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bowie vs Attica
- In Attica, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.9% in Bowie.
- In Attica, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.8% compared to 12.2% in Bowie.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Attica at 21.2%, compared to 5.9% in Bowie.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bowie hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.9% compared to 13.6% in Attica.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.