Demographics details for Boulder, CO vs Harlowton, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Boulder, CO vs Harlowton, MT.
| Data | Boulder | Harlowton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 105,485 | 933 |
| Median Age | 28.5 years | 50.7 years |
| Median Income | $80,243 | $55,536 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Boulder vs Harlowton
- In Boulder, the population is higher at 105,485, compared to 933 in Harlowton.
- The median age in Harlowton is higher at 50.7 years, compared to 28.5 years in Boulder.
- Boulder has a higher median income of $80,243 compared to $55,536 in Harlowton.
- In Harlowton, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 28.0% in Boulder.
- The poverty level is higher in Harlowton at 15%, compared to 12% in Boulder.
- The unemployment rate in Boulder is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.0% in Harlowton.
Demographics
Demographics Boulder vs Harlowton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Boulder | Harlowton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 74 | 90 |
| Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 11 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 1 |
| American Indian | 1 | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Boulder vs Harlowton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Boulder at 1% compared to 0% in Harlowton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Harlowton at 90% compared to 74% in Boulder.
- The Asian population is larger in Boulder at 6% compared to 0% in Harlowton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Boulder at 11% compared to 5% in Harlowton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Boulder at 7% compared to 1% in Harlowton.
- In Harlowton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 1% in Boulder.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Boulder | Harlowton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 12.9% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 10.9% | 21.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 21.7% |
| Obesity | 17.5% | 36.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Boulder vs Harlowton
- In Harlowton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 15.2% in Boulder.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Harlowton at 25.7% versus 23.3% in Boulder.
- Harlowton has a higher smoking rate at 21.4% compared to 10.9% in Boulder.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Harlowton at 21.7% compared to 19.5% in Boulder.
- Harlowton has higher obesity rates at 36.0% compared to 17.5% in Boulder.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Harlowton at 16.0% compared to 6.0% in Boulder.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Boulder | Harlowton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (324) | 0.5% (5) |
| High School Diploma | 2.9% (3,026) | 30.1% (281) |
| Less than High School | 3.3% (3,521) | 17.0% (159) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 43.6% (46,028) | 10.6% (99) |
Education Levels Comparison: Boulder vs Harlowton
- In Harlowton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Boulder.
- In Harlowton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.1% compared to 2.9% in Boulder.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Harlowton at 17.0%, compared to 3.3% in Boulder.
- A higher percentage of residents in Boulder hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 43.6% compared to 10.6% in Harlowton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.