Demographics details for Boulder, CO vs American fork, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Boulder, CO vs American fork, UT.
Data | Boulder | American fork |
---|---|---|
Population | 105,485 | 37,268 |
Median Age | 28.5 years | 28.0 years |
Median Income | $80,243 | $90,490 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Boulder vs American fork
- In Boulder, the population is higher at 105,485, compared to 37,268 in American fork.
- Residents in Boulder have a higher median age of 28.5 years compared to 28.0 years in American fork.
- American fork has a higher median income of $90,490, compared to $80,243 in Boulder.
- In American fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 28.0% in Boulder.
- Boulder has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in American fork.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Boulder and American fork at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Boulder vs American fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Boulder | American fork |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 74 | 84 |
Asian | 6 | 1 |
Hispanic | 11 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 6 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Boulder vs American fork
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Boulder at 1% compared to 0% in American fork.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in American fork at 84% compared to 74% in Boulder.
- The Asian population is larger in Boulder at 6% compared to 1% in American fork.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Boulder at 11% compared to 9% in American fork.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Boulder at 7% compared to 6% in American fork.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Boulder at 1% compared to 0% in American fork.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Boulder | American fork |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 14.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 9.8% |
Depression | 23.3% | 23.4% |
Smoking | 10.9% | 6.7% |
Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 8.5% |
Obesity | 17.5% | 29.5% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Boulder vs American fork
- More residents in Boulder report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 14.2% in American fork.
- Higher depression rates are seen in American fork at 23.4% versus 23.3% in Boulder.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Boulder at 10.9% compared to 6.7% in American fork.
- Binge drinking is more common in Boulder at 19.5% compared to 8.5% in American fork.
- American fork has higher obesity rates at 29.5% compared to 17.5% in Boulder.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in American fork at 8.0% compared to 6.0% in Boulder.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Boulder | American fork |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (324) | 0.6% (208) |
High School Diploma | 2.9% (3,026) | 7.4% (2,742) |
Less than High School | 3.3% (3,521) | 5.7% (2,134) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 43.6% (46,028) | 21.3% (7,922) |
Education Levels Comparison: Boulder vs American fork
- In American fork, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Boulder.
- In American fork, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 7.4% compared to 2.9% in Boulder.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in American fork at 5.7%, compared to 3.3% in Boulder.
- A higher percentage of residents in Boulder hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 43.6% compared to 21.3% in American fork.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.