Demographics details for Bothell, WA vs Cedarbluff, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bothell, WA vs Cedarbluff, MS.
Data | Bothell | Cedarbluff |
---|---|---|
Population | 49,017 | 170 |
Median Age | 38.0 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $127,944 | $60,000 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 50.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Bothell vs Cedarbluff
- In Bothell, the population is higher at 49,017, compared to 170 in Cedarbluff.
- The median age in Cedarbluff is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 38.0 years in Bothell.
- Bothell has a higher median income of $127,944 compared to $60,000 in Cedarbluff.
- In Cedarbluff, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 47.0% in Bothell.
- The poverty level is higher in Cedarbluff at 15%, compared to 6% in Bothell.
- Cedarbluff has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.8% in Bothell.
Demographics
Demographics Bothell vs Cedarbluff provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bothell | Cedarbluff |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 25 |
White | 63 | 70 |
Asian | 18 | 1 |
Hispanic | 9 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bothell vs Cedarbluff
- In Cedarbluff, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 1% in Bothell.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedarbluff at 70% compared to 63% in Bothell.
- The Asian population is larger in Bothell at 18% compared to 1% in Cedarbluff.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bothell at 9% compared to 2% in Cedarbluff.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bothell at 9% compared to 2% in Cedarbluff.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bothell and Cedarbluff at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bothell | Cedarbluff |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 25.7% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 8.9% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 17.5% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 26.2% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bothell vs Cedarbluff
- More residents in Bothell report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bothell at 25.7% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bothell at 8.9% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bothell at 17.5% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bothell at 26.2% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bothell at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bothell | Cedarbluff |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (276) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 6.4% (3,131) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 5.8% (2,838) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 39.0% (19,107) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bothell vs Cedarbluff
- A higher percentage of residents in Bothell have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bothell hold a high school diploma at 6.4% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
- More residents in Bothell have less than a high school education at 5.8% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bothell hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.0% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.