Demographics details for Boomer, NC vs Water valley, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Boomer, NC vs Water valley, MS.
Data | Boomer | Water valley |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,213 | 3,361 |
Median Age | 53.9 years | 35.8 years |
Median Income | $50,367 | $45,718 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 27.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Boomer vs Water valley
- The population in Water valley is higher at 3,361, compared to 1,213 in Boomer.
- Residents in Boomer have a higher median age of 53.9 years compared to 35.8 years in Water valley.
- Boomer has a higher median income of $50,367 compared to $45,718 in Water valley.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Boomer at 44.0% compared to 27.0% in Water valley.
- Boomer has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Water valley.
- Water valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 3.5% in Boomer.
Demographics
Demographics Boomer vs Water valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Boomer | Water valley |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 49 |
White | 91 | 49 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 2 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Boomer vs Water valley
- In Water valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 49% compared to 5% in Boomer.
- Boomer has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 49% in Water valley.
- Both Boomer and Water valley have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Boomer and Water valley at 2%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Boomer at 2% compared to 0% in Water valley.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Boomer and Water valley at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Boomer | Water valley |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 18.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 13.8% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 22.0% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 23.1% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 12.9% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 44.0% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Boomer vs Water valley
- In Water valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Water valley at 22.0% versus 0.0% in Boomer.
- Water valley has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Water valley at 12.9% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- Water valley has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- Disability percentages are higher in Boomer at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Water valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Boomer | Water valley |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.0% (34) |
High School Diploma | 21.2% (257) | 24.0% (805) |
Less than High School | 25.9% (314) | 13.0% (437) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.6% (116) | 9.6% (322) |
Education Levels Comparison: Boomer vs Water valley
- In Water valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- In Water valley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.0% compared to 21.2% in Boomer.
- More residents in Boomer have less than a high school education at 25.9% compared to 13.0% in Water valley.
- The percentage of residents with a bachelor's degree or higher is identical in both Boomer and Water valley at 9.6%.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.